Skip to main content

Security report for e-pwr.de

AdValue Group GmbH · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

EPWR, a product of AdValue Group GmbH based in Germany, is a specialized SaaS platform focused on optimizing Amazon Advertising campaigns through automated bidding, comprehensive reporting, and campaign management. The company holds a strong market position supported by multiple industry awards and partnerships, targeting Amazon sellers, vendors, and marketing agencies. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, Cloudflare CDN, and Google Tag Manager, ensuring fast performance and excellent mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS, HSTS, and secure cookies, though TLS protocols are not currently enabled, and DNS security features like DNSSEC and CAA are absent. No explicit security policy or incident response information is publicly available, which could be improved to enhance trust. Overall, the website demonstrates high professionalism, trustworthiness, and a clear focus on delivering value to Amazon advertisers.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching e-pwr.de

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
97
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
18
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

EPWR operates in the technology and e-commerce sectors, providing a centralized platform for Amazon Ads management. Its business model is SaaS-based, offering tools for reporting, bid and budget management, and campaign automation. The company benefits from strategic partnerships with related product providers and maintains a strong brand presence with consistent messaging and high-quality content. Customer testimonials from recognized agencies reinforce its market credibility. The platform's integration with Amazon Marketing Stream, DSP, and AMC highlights its comprehensive approach to Amazon Advertising. Growth indicators include multiple awards and a broad client base of brands and agencies. The partnership ecosystem includes AdValue Group and other marketing technology providers, supporting a robust service offering.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security baseline with a valid SSL certificate issued by Sectigo, secure cookie settings, and HSTS enabled. However, the absence of TLS 1.2 or higher protocols is a notable gap, potentially impacting secure communications. DNS security measures such as DNSSEC and CAA records are not implemented, which could expose the domain to certain DNS-based attacks. No public security policy or incident response contacts were found, limiting transparency in vulnerability handling and breach response. The site shows no known SSL vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or POODLE. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, with room for improvement in protocol support and public security governance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3 protocols to ensure secure encrypted communications.
  2. Implement DNSSEC and CAA DNS records to enhance domain name system security and certificate issuance control.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.
  5. Regularly review and update security headers and cookie policies to align with best practices.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
AdValue Group GmbH
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Webflow CMS and hosted behind Cloudflare CDN, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries and asynchronous loading for performance optimization. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tracking, alongside CCM19 and Finsweet components for UI enhancements. The site is bilingual (German and English) with language toggling implemented. Performance metrics indicate fast load times, though no explicit resource counts or page sizes were provided. Accessibility and SEO optimizations are good, with semantic HTML and meta tags properly configured. The absence of TLS protocol support is a technical risk. DNS configuration lacks DNSSEC and CAA records, which are recommended for enhanced security. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-optimized but could benefit from improved security protocol support and DNS hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with e-pwr.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review e-pwr.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.