Skip to main content

Security report for e-num.com

E-NUM · Technology · Russia

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

E-NUM is a technology company providing a passwordless authentication service that leverages a challenge-response mechanism via a mobile application. The service targets website owners and users seeking enhanced security for user authentication, boasting over 12 million active users. The business model focuses on integrating E-NUM authentication into websites to replace traditional password-based login systems, positioning itself as a secure alternative in the authentication market. Technically, the website employs common web technologies such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and FontAwesome, with additional UI components like Revolution Slider and Animate.css. However, the site suffers from slow load times and a high number of resources, indicating potential performance optimization opportunities. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility and SEO features are basic. From a security perspective, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support is a critical vulnerability, severely impacting the site's security posture. No security headers or advanced TLS configurations are present, and no cookie consent or terms of service policies are found. The site does provide a basic privacy policy and a support contact email, but overall privacy compliance is limited. Overall, while the business concept and content quality are solid, the lack of HTTPS and security best practices significantly lowers the trust and security scores. Strategic improvements in SSL deployment, security headers, and privacy compliance are essential to enhance the site's security and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching e-num.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
30
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention e-num.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2
Employees
0
Customers
2
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for e-num.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

E-NUM operates in the technology sector, specializing in authentication services that eliminate the need for passwords by using a mobile app-based challenge-response system. The company has a substantial user base, indicating market acceptance and a competitive position. Its business model revolves around providing authentication solutions to website owners, enabling secure user authorization. The presence of official mobile app links for iOS, Android, and Huawei platforms suggests a broad device compatibility strategy. The company maintains direct user engagement through support email and a registration form, although physical presence details are not disclosed. The lack of visible certifications or security policies may impact enterprise adoption but does not detract from its core service offering.

Security posture

The website's security posture is weak due to the complete lack of HTTPS support and an invalid SSL certificate, exposing users to potential interception and man-in-the-middle attacks. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are implemented, increasing risk from common web attacks. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms and terms of service further weakens compliance with privacy regulations like GDPR. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are evident, limiting transparency and readiness for security incidents. While no known vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or POODLE are detected, the fundamental lack of encryption is a critical flaw that must be addressed immediately to protect user data and maintain trust.

Recommendations

  1. Deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce HTTPS site-wide to secure user communications.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers including HSTS, Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a comprehensive cookie policy and consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations.
  4. Publish terms of service and security incident response policies to improve transparency and user trust.
  5. Optimize website performance by reducing resource count and improving load times, enhancing user experience.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional web stack with jQuery and Bootstrap frameworks, supplemented by FontAwesome icons and animation libraries. The presence of Revolution Slider indicates a focus on rich visual content. However, the site suffers from slow loading times (over 17 seconds) and a large number of resources (440), which could degrade user experience. No modern CMS or hosting provider information is detected. The lack of HTTPS and TLS support is a major technical deficiency. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility and SEO are only basic, suggesting room for improvement in technical implementation and modernization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with e-num.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review e-num.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.