Skip to main content

Security report for dynabyte.se

Dynabyte AB · Technology · Sweden

High risk. 12 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

36/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dynabyte AB is a Swedish IT consulting firm specializing in digital transformation, custom software development, and enterprise integration. The company positions itself as a leader in digital transformation consulting, recently expanding its capabilities through the acquisition of MercuryWorks, a Tampa-based software development company. Their services target businesses seeking to innovate and streamline their digital operations. Technically, the website is built using modern frameworks such as React and Gatsby, with Google Analytics integrated for user tracking. The site demonstrates good design quality, mobile optimization, and SEO practices, though accessibility features are basic. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and anonymizes IPs in analytics but lacks visible security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dynabyte.se

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
36

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Dynabyte operates in the technology sector, focusing on IT consulting and software development. Their business model revolves around providing tailored digital solutions and integration services to enterprises. The acquisition of MercuryWorks indicates growth and diversification. The company maintains physical offices in Sweden and the USA, signaling an international presence. Their target market includes organizations requiring agile and lean software development methodologies. The website content and news updates reflect active engagement with clients and the industry. Trust signals include LinkedIn presence and detailed contact information. However, the lack of explicit privacy and security policies may impact compliance perception.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and IP anonymization in Google Analytics. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are best practices to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which could hinder timely security issue reporting and resolution. The absence of a security.txt file or dedicated security contact channels reduces transparency. No forms are detected on the main page, minimizing attack surface from input fields. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities are evident, the site would benefit from enhanced security policy publication and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements and consent mechanisms.
  2. Implement and configure security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Create and publish an incident response policy and provide dedicated security contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance with standards such as WCAG.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Dynabyte AB
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dynabyte AB
Description
Dynabyte is an IT consulting company specializing in digital transformation, software development, and integration services. They emphasize understanding the whole picture and building technology solutions that connect all parts seamlessly.
Key services
Custom software development, Digital engineering, Enterprise integration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Gatsby, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Gatsby
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical URLs with https)
  • Anonymize IP in Google Analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in the main HTML content.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented in the footer with multiple phone numbers, emails, and physical addresses.
  4. Use of modern web technologies (React, Gatsby) and Google Analytics for tracking.
  5. No visible forms on the main page; no data collection forms detected.
  6. Social media presence includes LinkedIn link.
  7. Recent news posts indicate active business operations and growth via acquisition.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React and Gatsby framework stack, enabling fast static site generation and good SEO performance. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for analytics and marketing tracking. The site is mobile optimized and has a consistent branding and design quality. Performance is moderate, with optimized images and responsive layouts. No CMS is detected beyond the static site generator. Hosting provider details are not explicit. The site uses canonical and hreflang tags for SEO. Technical risks include lack of security headers and incomplete privacy compliance. There is no evidence of technical debt or legacy technologies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dynabyte.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dynabyte.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.