Skip to main content

Security report for dwalletlabs.com

dWallet Labs Ltd. · Technology · Israel

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

dWallet Labs Ltd. is a cybersecurity company based in Tel Aviv, Israel, specializing in blockchain technology and decentralized access control solutions. The company focuses on developing protocols and infrastructure for the Odsy Network, including the SingleWallet interface for dWallets. Positioned as core contributors to Zero Trust Protocols and the dWallet Network, they target blockchain developers and cybersecurity professionals in the Web3 ecosystem. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand with clear leadership and partner affiliations. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow platform, leveraging modern web technologies such as Google Fonts, jQuery, and Cloudflare DNS services. The site is mobile optimized with good SEO and basic accessibility features. Analytics are implemented via Plausible Analytics, indicating a privacy-conscious approach with minimal user tracking. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses domain status protections but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. There is no visible security policy, vulnerability disclosure, or cookie consent mechanism, which are gaps in compliance and security best practices. Contact information is available through emails and a contact form, supporting business credibility. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security policies, privacy compliance, and technical hardening to improve trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dwalletlabs.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
60
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

dWallet Labs operates in the niche intersection of cybersecurity and blockchain technology, focusing on decentralized access control and Zero Trust Protocols. Their business model centers on developing foundational infrastructure and protocols for the Odsy Network, positioning themselves as innovators in the Web3 security space. The company has established a network of partnerships with venture capital firms and blockchain organizations, enhancing their market credibility and growth potential. Their target customers include blockchain developers, enterprises seeking secure decentralized solutions, and cybersecurity stakeholders. The presence of a small, focused leadership team and recent domain registration aligns with a startup or early-stage company profile. The website content and partner ecosystem suggest a strategic emphasis on research, development, and security innovation.

Security posture

The security posture of dWallet Labs' website is moderate. HTTPS is properly implemented, and domain registration includes protective statuses against unauthorized changes. However, the absence of DNSSEC reduces DNS security. The lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options indicates room for improvement in mitigating common web vulnerabilities. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is published, which limits transparency and incident response readiness. The site collects user data via a contact form but lacks visible cookie consent or privacy policies, raising compliance concerns under GDPR and similar regulations. Overall, while foundational security measures are in place, enhancements in policy publication, header implementation, and compliance mechanisms are recommended to elevate the security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement and configure essential security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies along with a cookie consent mechanism to ensure GDPR and privacy compliance.
  4. Create and maintain a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting and incident response.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerable components are included and maintain secure coding practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
dWallet Labs Ltd.
Description
dWallet Labs Ltd., based in Tel Aviv, Israel, is a cybersecurity company specializing in blockchain technology, building protocols and solutions on top of the Odsy Network, including SingleWallet, an interface to interact with dWallets.
Key services
Security, Development, Research
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, Google Fonts (DM Sans), jQuery 3.5.1, Cloudflare DNS, Plausible Analytics
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS servers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
plausible.io
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is available via emails and contact form.
  4. Strong focus on cybersecurity and blockchain technology.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics with minimal tracking.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  7. No security headers detected in HTML content.
  8. Domain registration is recent but consistent with company claims.
  9. Multiple partner and investor domains linked, indicating ecosystem integration.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, which provides a modern and responsive design framework. It uses Google Fonts for typography and jQuery 3.5.1 for scripting. Hosting appears to be managed via Webflow with DNS services provided by Cloudflare, ensuring reliable uptime and performance. Plausible Analytics is used for privacy-focused visitor tracking. The site loads with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. SEO is adequately addressed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries, but security headers are missing, which is a technical risk. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dwalletlabs.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dwalletlabs.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.