Skip to main content

Security report for dsi.sk

DSI Czech & Slovak · Technology · Slovakia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DSI Czech & Slovak operates as a regional electronics retailer and information provider targeting consumers in Slovakia and the Czech Republic. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with a focus on electronics products, leveraging WordPress CMS and Elementor for content management and presentation. The company maintains a moderate market position with a clear target audience interested in electronics. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies including Cookiebot for GDPR compliance and Google Fonts for typography, though Google Analytics is present but not configured. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, but lacks advanced security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is partial due to the absence of a clear privacy policy and terms of service. Overall, the website is functional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of dsi.sk. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dsi.sk

This scan found 21 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
100
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as an important player in the electronics sector within Slovakia and the Czech Republic, focusing on product selection and consumer information. Its business model revolves around retail and content provision, targeting general consumers interested in electronics. The presence of a Facebook page indicates engagement with social media, though other channels are limited. The website's content and metadata suggest a medium-sized operation with consistent branding. There is no evidence of parent or subsidiary companies. The lack of explicit contact details and privacy documentation may limit customer trust and regulatory compliance. The company could improve by publishing comprehensive privacy and security policies and expanding contact channels.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Cookiebot for cookie consent management, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security, which are recommended best practices. The Google Analytics plugin is installed but not configured, which may lead to incomplete analytics data or privacy concerns. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, limiting transparency in security matters. No exposed sensitive data or known vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing security headers, configuring analytics properly, and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the website footer or main menu.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection.
  3. Configure Google Analytics properly or remove the plugin if not in use to avoid privacy compliance issues.
  4. Add clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security-related inquiries.
  5. Consider publishing a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
DSI Czech & Slovak
Description
Vyberáme pre vás to najlepšie zo sveta elektroniky
Key services
Electronics product selection and information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Google Fonts, Elementor, MonsterInsights (not configured), Cookiebot
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder
  2. Cookiebot is implemented for GDPR cookie consent management
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content
  5. Social media presence limited to Facebook link
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  7. Google Analytics plugin present but not configured
  8. Website content is in Slovak language with English alternate version
  9. SEO metadata and Open Graph tags are properly set
  10. No signs of adult or questionable content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.9.10 with Elementor 3.11.5 and uses jQuery 3.6.0. It loads Google Fonts and several CSS stylesheets for layout and icons. Cookiebot is integrated for cookie consent management, providing granular control over cookie categories. The site uses a responsive design with good mobile optimization. Performance is moderate, with no explicit performance optimization scripts detected. SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data is well implemented, supporting good search engine visibility. The site lacks advanced accessibility features beyond basic HTML semantics. No hosting provider information was detected from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but could benefit from performance and accessibility enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 63/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dsi.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dsi.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.