Skip to main content

Security report for drosiba.lv

Datu Drošība SIA · Technology · Latvia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

34/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Datu Drošība SIA is a Latvian company specializing in the installation and maintenance of video surveillance and data network systems for residential and commercial clients. Their website presents a professional image with clear service offerings including video camera installation, WiFi surveillance, data transmission network setup, and upgrades to existing systems. The company targets customers in Latvia seeking reliable security solutions. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Astra theme and Elementor page builder, with Google Analytics integrated for visitor tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and uses HTTPS, indicating a baseline of technical maturity. Security-wise, the site employs an anti-bot honeypot in its contact form but lacks explicit security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies, which are areas for improvement. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration verification. Overall, the website is functional, trustworthy, and suitable for its business purpose but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching drosiba.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
34

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates as a small-sized service provider in the technology sector focused on security and surveillance solutions within Latvia. Their business model centers on direct service delivery including installation and maintenance of video surveillance systems and data networks. The website content and contact details suggest a local market focus with no indication of subsidiaries or parent companies. The use of professional branding and clear contact channels supports credibility. The absence of privacy and cookie policies may impact compliance with GDPR, which is relevant for EU-based businesses. The company appears to have a moderate digital presence with room for growth in transparency and security posture.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and basic anti-bot measures in the contact form. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS which are recommended best practices. There is no published security policy or incident response information, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates compliance gaps with GDPR requirements. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security maturity is basic and could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers, formal policies, and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users about data handling.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance with standards and user experience.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for security vulnerabilities and update them promptly.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Datu Drošība SIA
Registration number
LV40003701502
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Datu Drošība SIA
Description
Datu Drošība specializes in video surveillance and data network system installations for homes and businesses in Latvia. They emphasize security as a priority and offer professional installation and maintenance services.
Key services
Video surveillance installation, WiFi video surveillance, Data transmission network setup, Existing video system upgrades, PTZ (movable) camera installation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Google Analytics, MonsterInsights, jQuery
Frameworks
Astra WordPress Theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Anti-bot honeypot field in contact form
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
MonsterInsights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress with Elementor and Astra theme.
  2. Content is in Latvian language targeting local customers.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with phone, email, and address.
  4. No privacy or cookie policy pages found.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information available.
  6. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  7. HTTPS is enabled and Google Analytics is used for tracking.
  8. Contact form includes anti-bot honeypot field.
  9. Social media links present but URLs are placeholders (#).
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using the Astra theme and Elementor page builder, which provides flexibility and ease of content management. Google Fonts and jQuery are used for styling and scripting, and Google Analytics is integrated via MonsterInsights for visitor tracking. The site loads external resources from trusted domains such as fonts.googleapis.com and wp.com CDN. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. The contact form uses a honeypot field to reduce spam. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and formal privacy disclosures. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small business website but can be improved in security and compliance aspects.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with drosiba.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review drosiba.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.