Skip to main content

Security report for dreamonkey.com

Dreamonkey · Technology · Italy

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 3 other checks.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dreamonkey is a small technology company based in Italy specializing in software development services including business software, web applications, augmented reality apps, mobile apps, and professional websites. The company targets businesses seeking custom software solutions and maintains a niche position in the regional market. The website is built using modern technologies such as Vue.js and employs Amazon Registrar for domain registration and hosting infrastructure. The site demonstrates good design quality and mobile optimization, providing a professional user experience. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled, but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC, which are recommended for enhanced protection. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies, which should be addressed to meet GDPR requirements. Overall, the website is functional and credible but would benefit from improved privacy disclosures and security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dreamonkey.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
55
Email security
75
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention dreamonkey.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for dreamonkey.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Dreamonkey operates as a service provider in the technology sector, focusing on software development for companies. Its business model revolves around delivering customized digital solutions including augmented reality and mobile applications, indicating a focus on innovative technologies. The company appears to be small-sized with a foundation date consistent with the domain registration in 2016. The lack of visible contact information and certifications on the website suggests opportunities to enhance trust and transparency. The use of Piwik PRO analytics indicates a moderate level of user tracking, which should be balanced with privacy compliance. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data provided.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications, which is a fundamental security measure. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the defense-in-depth posture. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose the domain to DNS spoofing attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is published, limiting transparency for security researchers. The lack of privacy and cookie policies also indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No forms or input fields were detected, reducing the attack surface from user input. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Implement standard security headers to improve protection against common web attacks.
  3. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to enhance DNS security.
  4. Add a security.txt file and incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  5. Include clear contact information such as company email and phone numbers to improve trust and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dreamonkey
Description
Software house based in Reggio Emilia that develops business software, web apps, augmented reality apps, mobile apps and professional websites for company.
Key services
business software development, web apps, augmented reality apps, mobile apps, professional websites
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Vue.js, IntersectionObserver API, Roboto font
Frameworks
Vue.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Piwik PRO
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
piwik.pro
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional software house site with clear business focus.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided content.
  4. Uses modern JavaScript framework Vue.js and loads fonts and scripts efficiently.
  5. No visible security headers detected in provided data; HTTPS is enabled.
  6. Uses Piwik PRO analytics indicating moderate user tracking.
  7. No forms detected in the provided HTML snippet.
  8. No social media links explicitly found in the provided content.
  9. No structured data (JSON-LD) detected in the provided content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Vue.js, a modern JavaScript framework, and uses the Roboto font family for typography. It leverages Amazon Registrar for domain registration and likely AWS infrastructure for hosting. The site loads external scripts from Piwik PRO for analytics, indicating a moderate level of user tracking. Performance appears moderate with preloading of fonts and deferred script loading. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO optimization is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph tags. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from additional security and privacy enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dreamonkey.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dreamonkey.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.