Skip to main content

Security report for dreamler.com

Dreamler AB · Technology · Sweden

High risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dreamler AB operates a technology-focused SaaS platform that enables teams to visualize workflows and goals through collaborative boards accessible via desktop and mobile applications. The company targets organizations seeking enhanced team collaboration and process visualization, positioning itself as a niche provider in this space. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with good content quality and clear navigation. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern frameworks like Bootstrap and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site is trustworthy and functional but could improve in security and privacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dreamler.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
65
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
28
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention dreamler.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
25
Employees
0
Customers
25
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for dreamler.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Dreamler AB's market positioning leverages visual collaboration tools to differentiate from generic project management software. Their SaaS business model with free trials suggests a focus on customer acquisition and subscription revenue. The presence of a community support site indicates an engaged user base and ecosystem. The company maintains active social media channels and a regularly updated blog, supporting brand awareness and customer engagement. However, the absence of detailed business metrics or certifications limits deeper competitive analysis. The technology stack and marketing integrations reflect a commitment to digital growth and user analytics.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data leaks. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which may hinder rapid response to security events. The use of multiple third-party analytics and tracking services increases the attack surface and privacy risks. Compliance with GDPR is partial, with a privacy policy but no cookie consent banner. Overall, the security posture is functional but would benefit from enhanced policies, headers, and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Add a cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider creating a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dreamler AB
Description
Dreamler provides a visual collaboration platform that helps teams visualize workflows and goals, enabling efficient process building, communication, and progress tracking.
Key services
Visual workflow boards, Mobile and desktop collaboration apps, Goal tracking and progress visualization, Reusable process templates
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 4.4.1, Bootstrap, jQuery, Slider Revolution, Visual Composer, Google Fonts (Open Sans), Mixpanel, Segment Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Disqus Comments, AddThis Sharing
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure analytics scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Mixpanel, Segment Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Mixpanel, LinkedIn Insight
Marketing tools
AddThis, Segment Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL
  2. No visible security headers detected
  3. No cookie consent mechanism present
  4. Contact information primarily via contact form and social media
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies found
  6. Use of multiple third-party analytics and tracking services
  7. Content is professionally presented and relevant to business
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 4.4.1 with Bootstrap and jQuery frameworks, supplemented by plugins like Slider Revolution and Visual Composer for content management. It uses Google Fonts and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Mixpanel, Segment, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight. Performance is moderate, with some reliance on external CDNs and scripts. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO practices are evident through meta tags and structured data. However, the WordPress version is outdated, potentially exposing the site to security risks. The technical stack is solid but requires modernization and security hardening to reduce technical debt and operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dreamler.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dreamler.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.