Skip to main content

Security report for drda.io

Dreamdata · Technology · Denmark

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dreamdata is a Denmark-based medium-sized technology company founded in 2018, specializing in B2B marketing activation and attribution through a SaaS platform. The company offers comprehensive services including customer journey mapping, AI-driven intent signals, and conversion syncing to major ad platforms, positioning itself as a trusted leader in the B2B marketing space. Technically, the website is built on Squarespace CMS and integrates modern analytics and marketing tools such as Segment, HubSpot, and Cookiebot, demonstrating a mature digital infrastructure. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of modern TLS protocols represent significant security vulnerabilities that need urgent remediation. The company maintains strong DNS security policies with SPF and DMARC, and holds a SOC 2 certification, indicating a commitment to security and compliance. Overall, Dreamdata presents a professional and trustworthy online presence with good privacy and cookie management practices, but must address critical SSL/TLS issues to enhance its security posture.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of drda.io. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching drda.io

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Dreamdata operates in the technology sector, targeting B2B marketers and marketing operations teams with a SaaS business model focused on marketing attribution and activation. The company leverages AI to provide precise audience targeting and performance analytics, enabling efficient campaign optimization. Its market position is strengthened by partnerships with major platforms like LinkedIn, HubSpot, and Google Cloud, and by a strong presence on review platforms such as G2 and Trustpilot. The company’s growth is supported by comprehensive content, including benchmarks, case studies, and educational resources, reflecting a strategic approach to market engagement and customer education.

Security posture

The current security posture of Dreamdata’s website shows a mix of strengths and weaknesses. The presence of a strict DMARC policy with reject action and reporting, along with a valid SPF record, indicates good email security practices. The use of Cookiebot for consent management and SOC 2 certification further demonstrate compliance and security awareness. However, the lack of a valid SSL certificate, absence of TLS protocols, and missing HSTS and OCSP stapling significantly weaken the site’s security, exposing users to potential risks. There is no explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information found, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires immediate improvements in transport layer security.

Recommendations

  1. Install and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate supporting TLS 1.2 or 1.3 to secure data in transit.
  2. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload to enforce secure connections.
  3. Implement OCSP stapling to improve certificate validation performance and reliability.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to enhance transparency and facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Establish and publicize incident response contact channels to improve security incident management and communication.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Dreamdata.io ApS
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on Google Cloud infrastructure with DNS managed via Google Cloud DNS. It uses Squarespace as the CMS, integrating multiple third-party services including Cookiebot for cookie consent, Segment for analytics, HubSpot for marketing automation, and various social media platforms for engagement. The site has a large page size and high load time, indicating potential performance optimization opportunities. Mobile optimization and accessibility are good, with clear navigation and consistent branding. However, the lack of valid SSL/TLS configuration is a critical technical risk. The technology stack is modern but requires security hardening and performance tuning to reduce technical debt and improve user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 81/100 +1Low25 findingsView report
  2. 80/100Low26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with drda.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review drda.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.