Skip to main content

Security report for draugiem.lv

Draugiem.lv · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Draugiem.lv is Latvia's first and most popular domestic social networking site, offering users the ability to register, create friendships, and utilize various portal features. The platform targets Latvian internet users seeking social connectivity and community engagement. Technically, the website employs standard web technologies including JavaScript and CSS, with assets hosted on an external domain (ifrype.com). HTTPS is enforced with a Content Security Policy to upgrade insecure requests, indicating a baseline security posture. However, the absence of visible privacy and cookie policies, as well as contact information, suggests gaps in compliance and user trust facilitation. Overall, the site presents a professional and consistent brand image but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security disclosures.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of draugiem.lv. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching draugiem.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Draugiem.lv holds a strong market position as a leading social network in Latvia, focusing on community building and social interaction. Its business model revolves around user engagement and potentially advertising or premium services, although no explicit monetization details are visible. The platform's ecosystem appears self-contained with no evident partnerships or subsidiaries disclosed. Growth indicators and strategic partnerships are not discernible from the provided data. The company maintains a consistent brand presence and targets a broad Latvian audience, positioning itself as an essential player in the local social media landscape.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and a Content Security Policy in place. JavaScript error reporting is implemented, which aids in monitoring client-side issues. However, the lack of additional security headers such as X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection, and Strict-Transport-Security limits the defense-in-depth strategy. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The absence of a security.txt file or explicit incident response contacts indicates room for improvement in vulnerability disclosure and incident management readiness. Compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations is unclear due to missing privacy and cookie policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and prominently display comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers including X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection, and Strict-Transport-Security to strengthen security posture.
  3. Publish a security.txt file and provide clear incident response contact channels to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  4. Include verified contact information such as company emails and phone numbers to improve transparency and credibility.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and update CSP directives to restrict script sources and mitigate risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Draugiem.lv
Description
Draugiem.lv ir Latvijas pirmā un populārākā pašmāju sociālā tīkla vietne. Reģistrējies, veido draudzīgas saites un izmanto citas portāla sniegtās iespējas.
Key services
Social networking, Friend connections, Messaging, Media sharing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, SVG icons, RPC API calls
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content Security Policy present
  • JavaScript error reporting implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a Latvian social network platform with localized content.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided HTML.
  3. HTTPS is enforced with CSP header present.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  6. Use of external domain ifrype.com for hosting CSS and JS assets.
  7. No obvious signs of adult or NSFW content.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard web technology stack with JavaScript and CSS assets loaded from an external domain. The presence of SVG icons and RPC API calls indicates a modern approach to UI and backend communication. Performance appears moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO optimization is basic, with meta tags and Open Graph properties present but no advanced structured data like JSON-LD detected. Hosting details and CMS usage are not explicitly identified. Opportunities exist to improve technical robustness through enhanced accessibility, SEO, and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 60/100 −5Medium32 findingsView report
  2. 65/100 −1Medium30 findingsView report
  3. 66/100 +1Medium26 findingsView report
  4. 65/100Medium25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with draugiem.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review draugiem.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.