Skip to main content

Security report for drata.com

Drata, Inc. · Technology · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Drata, Inc. operates a leading AI-native SaaS platform designed to automate governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) processes for businesses ranging from startups to enterprises. The platform integrates multiple compliance frameworks such as SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, and others, enabling customers to accelerate security reviews and manage risk proactively. Drata's market position is strong, with over 7,500 customers including a significant portion of the Cloud 100, supported by high customer satisfaction and trust indicators. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies including React and Next.js, hosted on Vercel, with integrated analytics and consent management tools. The site demonstrates excellent performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is robust, with HTTPS enforced, presence of security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Business credibility is high, supported by transparent contact information, legal company data, and strong branding. Overall, Drata presents a trustworthy, professional, and technically sound online presence aligned with its business objectives and compliance focus.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of drata.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching drata.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
70
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Drata is positioned as a market leader in compliance automation, leveraging AI to transform traditional GRC from manual and siloed processes into continuous trust management. Its SaaS business model targets a broad customer base including startups, mid-market, and enterprise clients. The company benefits from strategic partnerships and customer success stories with notable brands like Calendly and Lemonade. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees for platform access and premium features. The company emphasizes enterprise-grade flexibility and AI-powered assurance, differentiating itself in a competitive market. The partnership ecosystem and comprehensive framework support indicate a well-rounded growth strategy.

Security posture

Drata exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of security headers, and integration of consent management for privacy compliance. The platform supports multiple recognized security frameworks and certifications, enhancing trustworthiness. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies were explicitly found, suggesting an area for improvement. No security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the website content. The presence of customer testimonials and trust centers further indicates a strong security culture. Overall, the security maturity level is high with minor gaps in public incident response transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy page to improve transparency and trust.
  2. Implement and publicly link a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability reporting.
  3. Review and enhance HTTP security headers such as X-Content-Type-Options and X-XSS-Protection if not already configured.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and integrations for potential security risks and privacy compliance.
  5. Continue to expand privacy compliance measures and clearly communicate data retention policies.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Drata, Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Drata, Inc.
Description
Drata's AI-native platform helps automate compliance, manage risk, and accelerate security reviews to enable faster business growth.
Key services
Automated Governance, Integrated Risk Management, Continuous Compliance, Accelerated Assurance, AI-Powered Questionnaire Assistance
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Vercel hosting, Google Tag Manager, Google Ads, ConsentJS (DataGrail), Vercel Analytics, Vercel Speed Insights
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Vercel
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager with consent management
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Vercel Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Mutiny Personalization
Marketing tools
Mutiny Personalization
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear branding and consistent messaging.
  2. Strong emphasis on AI-powered compliance automation and risk management.
  3. Multiple trust signals including customer logos, testimonials, and certifications.
  4. Comprehensive navigation with detailed resources and framework support.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and performance optimization.
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are present with consent mechanisms.
  7. No signs of blocking or WAF interference detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React/Next.js stack hosted on Vercel, ensuring fast load times and scalability. Contentful CMS is used for content management, enabling dynamic and structured content delivery. The site includes advanced analytics and marketing tools with consent management, balancing business intelligence and privacy. Mobile optimization and accessibility are well implemented. Technical risks are minimal, with no visible outdated or vulnerable libraries. Opportunities exist to further enhance security headers and incident response transparency. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a high-quality user experience and robust business operations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 78/100Low23 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with drata.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review drata.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.