Skip to main content

Security report for dragora.org

Dragora GNU/Linux · Technology · Argentina

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dragora.org represents an independent GNU/Linux distribution project focused on providing a fully free software system emphasizing stability, security, and simplicity. The project is small but established, with a domain registered since 2008 and operated by Dragora GNU/Linux based in Argentina. The website presents clear information about the distribution's philosophy and key features such as the Trinity Desktop Environment and SysV init without systemd. Technically, the site uses a modern Bootstrap framework with responsive design and static content delivery, ensuring moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security-wise, the site lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC but benefits from no tracking or analytics scripts, enhancing user privacy. However, the absence of privacy, cookie, and terms policies, as well as contact information, limits compliance and user trust. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional but could improve in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of dragora.org. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dragora.org

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Dragora GNU/Linux operates in the technology sector as a niche open source software distributor targeting users who value free software principles and system stability. The business model is donation-supported, offering the distribution free of charge. The project maintains a consistent brand and clear messaging, positioning itself as a reliable alternative to mainstream Linux distributions with a focus on simplicity and security. The lack of commercial partnerships or subsidiaries indicates a small, community-driven operation. Growth potential lies in attracting users seeking systemd-free environments and lightweight software stacks. The absence of contact and policy pages suggests an opportunity to enhance professionalism and user engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled (assumed from domain and modern standards) and no tracking scripts, which is positive for privacy. However, the lack of DNSSEC, security headers, and published security policies or incident response contacts indicates room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The absence of forms reduces attack surface but also limits user interaction. Compliance with GDPR and other regulations is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be enhanced by adopting best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS integrity and security.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Add clear contact information including emails for support and security incident reporting.
  5. Consider establishing a formal security policy and vulnerability disclosure program to enhance security culture and transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dragora GNU/Linux
Description
Dragora is an independent GNU/Linux distribution designed from scratch to provide a system composed only by free software, emphasizing stability, security, and simplicity.
Key services
GNU/Linux distribution, Software package management, Desktop environment (Trinity Desktop Environment), System initialization without systemd
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, Static HTML/CSS, SVG images
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • No tracking or analytics cookies used

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
excellent

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the website.
  2. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided.
  3. No social media or external business contact links found.
  4. Website uses modern responsive design with Bootstrap.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, respecting user privacy.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data; potential improvement area.
  7. Domain DNSSEC not enabled, which could improve DNS security.
  8. Website content is focused on free software and GNU/Linux distribution.
  9. No forms or data collection mechanisms detected on the homepage.
  10. No security or incident response information published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using static HTML with Bootstrap CSS framework, ensuring responsive design and moderate performance. No CMS or dynamic backend detected, reducing complexity and attack surface. The site uses SVG logos and standard meta tags for SEO. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, enhancing privacy. Hosting details are limited to registrar information; no CDN or cloud hosting detected. Accessibility is basic but functional. The site could benefit from improved SEO metadata and accessibility features. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small open source project website but lacks advanced features or integrations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 61/100Medium23 findings · partial scanView report
  2. 57/100Medium19 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dragora.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dragora.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.