Skip to main content

Security report for dragdropr.com

DragDropr · Technology · Austria

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DragDropr is a technology company specializing in a visual drag & drop page builder that integrates seamlessly with multiple CMS and e-commerce platforms such as WordPress, Magento, Shopify, and Lightspeed. The company targets website owners, agencies, content managers, and small businesses seeking an easy-to-use content creation tool without requiring coding skills. Their market position is that of a versatile, cross-platform content builder offering both standalone and white-label solutions. The website is professionally designed, with clear navigation and comprehensive content describing their services and benefits. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with the Enfold theme and uses modern plugins and analytics tools, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though explicit security headers and policies are not fully documented. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a concern for domain legitimacy, but the overall business credibility is supported by transparent contact information and active social media presence. Strategic recommendations include improving transparency around security policies, publishing vulnerability disclosure information, and enhancing WHOIS data visibility to strengthen trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dragdropr.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
83
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

DragDropr operates in the SaaS space providing a drag & drop visual content builder compatible with multiple CMS and e-commerce platforms. Their competitive advantage lies in cross-system usability and ease of use without coding. Revenue likely comes from subscription plans and white-label licensing. The target customer segments include agencies, webshop owners, CMS providers, and small businesses. The company shows growth indicators through active social media and continuous product development. Partnerships with major CMS and e-commerce platforms enhance their ecosystem. The business model focuses on simplifying web content creation and editing, addressing pain points of traditional WYSIWYG editors. The company is based in Austria and appears to be a small-sized enterprise founded around 2017.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms implemented. Use of Google Analytics Opt-Out and Cookiebot indicates attention to privacy compliance. However, explicit security headers are not clearly visible, and no published security policy or incident response information was found. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file, which are best practices for transparency and security culture. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a SaaS website but could be improved by formalizing security policies and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a detailed security policy and incident response plan on the website.
  2. Implement and verify all recommended HTTP security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, etc.).
  3. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for security vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility compliance to improve inclusivity and SEO.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
DragDropr
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
DragDropr
Description
DragDropr is a visual drag & drop page builder which seamlessly integrates in your CMS (e.g. WordPress, Magento). Start your free DragDropr trial today!
Key services
Visual drag & drop page builder, CMS integrations (WordPress, Magento, Shopify, Lightspeed, TYPO3), Browser extension for frontend editing, White label page builder solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, Enfold Theme 7.0, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, jQuery 3.7.1, Monarch plugin, Intercom, InnerTrends analytics, Blinkloader, FontAwesome
Frameworks
WordPress, Enfold Theme Framework
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google Analytics opt-out implemented
  • Cookie consent mechanism present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (e.g., Google Analytics Opt-Out plugin)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, InnerTrends, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
InnerTrends, Intercom
Marketing tools
Intercom, InnerTrends
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  3. WHOIS data is missing, which reduces trustworthiness
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and comprehensive
  5. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address
  6. Website uses modern WordPress CMS with popular plugins and SEO optimizations
  7. Security headers are not explicitly visible but HTTPS is enforced
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response information found
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file found
  10. Social media presence is active and linked
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Enfold theme and several popular plugins including Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, and Monarch. The tech stack includes jQuery and FontAwesome for UI elements. Performance is moderate with some optimization via Blinkloader. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Analytics and marketing tools are integrated with user consent mechanisms. No major technical debt or outdated libraries were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional SaaS offering with room for performance and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dragdropr.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dragdropr.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.