Skip to main content

Security report for dotfox.cz

dotFOX s.r.o. · Technology · Czech Republic

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

dotFOX s.r.o. is a Czech digital marketing company specializing in affiliate marketing, lead generation, and performance marketing, with additional proprietary projects in financial comparison and affiliate networks. Established in 2014, the company positions itself as a professional and experienced player in the Czech online marketing sector, targeting businesses seeking effective marketing partnerships. The website is well-structured, professionally designed using modern frontend technologies such as Bootstrap and jQuery, and includes Google Analytics for user tracking. However, it lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance. Security posture is moderate with no visible security headers and no publicly disclosed security policies or incident response mechanisms. The domain registration data is consistent with the business claims, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the website presents a credible business but requires improvements in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dotfox.cz

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

dotFOX operates in the technology sector focusing on digital marketing services with a small company size. Their business model includes providing affiliate marketing programs, performance marketing, lead generation, and managing their own projects such as financial portals and affiliate networks. The company has a clear market position in the Czech Republic with nearly a decade of experience and a professional team. Contact information and company registration details are transparent, supporting trust. The absence of social media links and certifications suggests opportunities for enhancing brand visibility and trust. The company uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for marketing insights but lacks visible compliance mechanisms for user privacy.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS implied but no explicit security headers detected in the provided data. There is no public security policy or incident response information, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present. Forms are present but no explicit security measures such as CAPTCHA or input validation are visible. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing security headers, publishing security policies, and enhancing privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  4. Enhance contact information with dedicated security or abuse contact channels.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
dotFOX s.r.o.
VAT number
CZ 026 14 791
Registration number
026 14 791
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
dotFOX s.r.o.
Description
dotFOX is a Czech company specializing in affiliate marketing, lead generation, performance marketing, and managing their own projects such as financial comparators and affiliate networks. They emphasize long-term partnerships and professional online marketing services.
Key services
affiliate marketing, performance marketing, lead generation, own projects (financial comparators, affiliate network, financial magazine)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, Google Analytics, Nivo Lightbox, Owl Carousel, Isotope, Waypoints, Parallax.js
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS assumed (not explicitly stated but Google Analytics scripts loaded via https)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with company email and physical address
  4. No security policies or incident response information publicly available
  5. Use of modern frontend technologies and Google Analytics for tracking
  6. No explicit CMS detected; likely custom or static site built with Bootstrap and jQuery
  7. No social media links found in the HTML content
  8. No certifications or trust badges displayed
  9. Website content is in Czech language with some English meta tags
  10. Company emphasizes affiliate marketing and performance marketing services
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern frontend stack based on Bootstrap and jQuery, with additional libraries for UI effects such as Owl Carousel, Nivo Lightbox, and Parallax.js. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are integrated for analytics and marketing tracking. The site appears to be custom-built without a common CMS. Performance is moderate with some optimization potential. Mobile responsiveness is good, but accessibility features are basic. SEO optimization is minimal with basic meta tags but no structured data or Open Graph tags detected. No hosting provider information is available from the provided data. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced SEO and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dotfox.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dotfox.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.