Skip to main content

Security report for dotall.com

Pixel & Tonic, Inc. · Technology · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pixel & Tonic, Inc. operates Craft CMS, a flexible and user-friendly content management system designed for creating custom digital experiences. The company has established a strong market position since its founding in 2013, targeting web developers and businesses seeking advanced CMS solutions. Their website showcases upcoming and past events, educational resources, and community engagement, reflecting a mature and professional business model focused on software products and hosting services. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies including JavaScript, Vimeo video embeds, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and Sentry for error tracking. Hosting is inferred to be on Amazon AWS infrastructure, supported by the use of AWS DNS servers. The site demonstrates excellent performance, mobile optimization, and good accessibility features, with comprehensive SEO metadata and structured data enhancing discoverability. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS with a strong SSL configuration and employs cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR. While no explicit security policy or incident response information is published, the absence of exposed sensitive data and use of monitoring tools like Sentry indicate a reasonable security posture. Recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, and publishing security policies to further enhance trust. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-maintained, with no signs of malicious content or blocking by WAFs. The domain registration is consistent with the business history and ownership, supporting a high legitimacy score. Strategic improvements in security transparency and DNS security would further strengthen the company's digital maturity and risk management.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dotall.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention dotall.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for dotall.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Craft CMS is positioned as a specialized technology provider in the CMS market, offering software, hosting, and community-driven services. Their business model centers on product sales, cloud hosting, and ecosystem expansion through plugins and support. The company targets developers and enterprises needing customizable CMS solutions, leveraging events and educational content to foster community and brand loyalty. The parent company, Pixel & Tonic, Inc., maintains a consistent brand presence and operates related domains. The company shows indicators of medium size with a stable market presence and growth through new hosting offerings and active community engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented in compliance with GDPR. Use of Sentry for error monitoring adds to proactive security management. However, the lack of published security policies, incident response contacts, and DNSSEC implementation are gaps that could be addressed. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Security headers are not evident, suggesting room for improvement in defense-in-depth strategies. Overall, the security maturity is good but could benefit from enhanced transparency and DNS security measures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS integrity and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information on the website.
  3. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Provide explicit security contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses).
  5. Continue to maintain GDPR compliance and enhance user privacy transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Pixel & Tonic, Inc.
Description
Craft is a flexible, user-friendly CMS for creating custom digital experiences on the web and beyond.
Key services
Craft CMS software, Hosting (Craft Cloud), Plugin Store, Support services, Community engagement
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Vimeo video embeds, Google Tag Manager, Sentry for error tracking, MaxMind GeoIP2, One Cookie Consent plugin
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent opt-in mechanism
  • Use of Sentry for error monitoring
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content including events, videos, and resources.
  2. Strong branding and consistent design throughout the site.
  3. Use of modern web technologies and third-party services for analytics and error tracking.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and comply with GDPR requirements.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via web form.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  7. No security headers detected in provided data; DNSSEC not enabled.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Craft CMS and uses a modern technology stack including JavaScript, Vimeo for video content, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and Sentry for error tracking. Hosting is provided via AWS infrastructure, inferred from DNS servers. The site is well-optimized for performance and mobile devices, with good SEO and accessibility practices. No technical debt or outdated libraries were detected. The site uses a cookie consent plugin with opt-in compliance, reflecting attention to privacy regulations. Overall, the technical implementation supports a fast, secure, and user-friendly experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dotall.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dotall.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.