Skip to main content

Security report for dorosh.net

dorosh.net · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

dorosh.net is a Riga-based digital production agency established in 2009, offering a range of services including creative design, web development, hosting, and internet marketing. The company targets businesses seeking cost-effective digital solutions and has built a solid reputation with over 100 clients and 200 completed projects. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with good content quality and clear navigation. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using common technologies such as PHP, MySQL, jQuery, and integrates with popular platforms like WooCommerce and Magento. The performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. However, there is room for improvement in accessibility and SEO practices. Analytics tools like Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for user tracking. From a security perspective, the website uses HTTPS and has domain status protections but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are recommended for enhanced security. There are no published security policies or incident response contacts, and privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional digital agency but should address privacy compliance and security best practices to improve its risk posture and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dorosh.net

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates as a mid-sized digital agency in the technology sector, focusing on web design, development, hosting, and marketing services. Its competitive advantages include a decade-plus experience, a broad service portfolio, and a stable client base. The business model is service-oriented, targeting SMEs and enterprises needing digital transformation and online presence enhancement. Revenue streams likely come from project-based contracts and ongoing hosting and marketing services. The partnership ecosystem includes integrations with major platforms like WordPress, WooCommerce, Magento, and payment processors such as PayPal and FirstData. Strategic observations suggest the company maintains a solid market position in Riga with potential growth opportunities through enhanced digital marketing and security compliance.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The website benefits from HTTPS encryption and domain registration protections but lacks advanced DNS security (DNSSEC) and critical HTTP security headers. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries was found, but the absence of a published security policy and incident response contacts indicates gaps in security governance. Compliance with GDPR is uncertain due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The use of common CMS and plugins requires regular updates to mitigate vulnerabilities. Overall, the security culture appears basic with opportunities to strengthen incident response readiness and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements and implement a cookie consent mechanism.
  4. Develop and publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  5. Regularly audit and update CMS, plugins, and third-party integrations to reduce the risk of vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
dorosh.net
Description
dorosh.net is a digital production agency based in Riga, founded in 2009. They provide creative design, web development, hosting services, and internet marketing. The company emphasizes cost-effective solutions and professional customer service, serving over 100 clients with 200+ completed projects.
Key services
Creative Design, Web Development, Hosting Services, Internet Marketing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
PHP, MySQL, jQuery, WordPress, WooCommerce, Magento, Drupal, PrestaShop, Google Analytics, Google Maps API
Frameworks
WPBakery Page Builder
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientRenewProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google AdWords
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional digital agency with clear service offerings
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps
  3. No explicit security policies or incident response information published
  4. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and technologies
  5. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a security improvement opportunity
  6. Contact information is clearly provided in footer
  7. No signs of WAF or content blocking
  8. Good branding consistency and content quality
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using PHP, MySQL, and jQuery, supported by WPBakery Page Builder for content management. It integrates with multiple e-commerce and CMS platforms such as WooCommerce, Magento, Drupal, and PrestaShop, indicating flexibility in service offerings. The site loads moderate content including video backgrounds and image carousels, which may impact performance but is balanced with caching and asynchronous script loading. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. Hosting details are not explicit but domain registrar is Cosmotown, Inc. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from modernization in security and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dorosh.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dorosh.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.