Skip to main content

Security report for donoharm.world

Private by Design, LLC · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DoNoHarm is a small US-based software company founded in 2019, specializing in niche software products such as Monocle, Kleio, and WaterCooler, targeting developers and businesses needing specialized tools. The website is built on a modern React/Next.js stack, hosted via bunny.net, and demonstrates good mobile optimization and user experience. However, the site lacks explicit contact information and comprehensive privacy or security policies. Security posture is moderate with no detected WAF or blocking mechanisms but missing security headers and DNSSEC. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but could improve in compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching donoharm.world

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
25
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
50
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector with a focused product suite and consulting services. Market positioning is niche with a small business scale. The business model relies on software product sales and consulting. The absence of contact details and social media presence limits direct customer engagement visibility. Hosting and domain registration are consistent with the business profile, indicating legitimacy. No partnerships or subsidiaries are publicly linked.

Security posture

Security maturity is basic to moderate. The domain uses HTTPS and has registrar protections but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. No incident response or security policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. Privacy policies exist but lack strong GDPR compliance features such as consent mechanisms. No forms or data collection points are present on the homepage, reducing attack surface. Overall, security practices are minimal but adequate for a small software company.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to improve browser security.
  3. Add explicit GDPR compliance features including cookie consent banners and detailed privacy policy.
  4. Publish contact information and a dedicated security incident response policy to improve trust and readiness.
  5. Consider adding terms of service and vulnerability disclosure policy to enhance transparency and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Private by Design, LLC
Description
DoNoHarm is a miniature software company offering products such as Monocle (search for Squarespace hosted websites), Kleio (API-driven ad server), and WaterCooler (tool for remote team socialization).
Key services
Monocle, Kleio, WaterCooler, Consulting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, JavaScript
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a small software company site with clear product offerings.
  2. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed on the homepage.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present but basic and lack explicit GDPR compliance mechanisms.
  4. No terms of service or security/incident response policies found.
  5. No forms detected on the homepage; no data collection observed.
  6. No social media links or company contact details found.
  7. Modern React/Next.js tech stack with good mobile optimization.
  8. Hosting via bunny.net nameservers suggests reliable CDN/hosting.
  9. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  10. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL status unknown but HTTPS implied by canonical URL.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern React and Next.js framework with server-side rendering and static export features. Hosting is via bunny.net, a reliable CDN provider. The site loads quickly and is mobile optimized. No CMS detected, indicating a custom or static site approach. SEO is supported with canonical tags and meta viewport. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal data collection. The site lacks some accessibility features but overall provides a good user experience. Technical debt appears low with opportunities to improve security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with donoharm.world. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review donoharm.world.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.