Skip to main content

Security report for donationalerts.com

Zaya Solutions Limited · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DonationAlerts is a professional platform providing streamers with interactive tools to monetize and engage their audiences through donations, subscriptions, polls, and media sharing. The platform integrates with major streaming services such as Twitch, YouTube, and Facebook, positioning itself as a key player in the streaming ecosystem with millions of users and alerts processed. The website is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and offers comprehensive legal and privacy documentation, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript libraries including Vue.js and jQuery, and integrates multiple analytics and tracking services such as Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel. While the site uses HTTPS and secure authentication methods, it lacks explicit security headers and publicly available security policies, which are areas for improvement. The absence of WHOIS data limits the ability to fully verify domain registration legitimacy, though the business branding and content quality suggest a legitimate operation. Security posture is generally strong with encrypted connections and no visible vulnerabilities, but the lack of incident response information and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms could pose risks. Privacy compliance is supported by clear privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms, though contact information for security or data protection officers is not found. Overall, DonationAlerts presents a trustworthy and professional service for streamers, but should enhance transparency around security policies and domain registration details to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 10 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching donationalerts.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
75
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

DonationAlerts operates in the technology and media sectors, focusing on stream monetization tools. Its business model is platform-based, generating revenue likely through service fees or commissions on donations. The platform targets a large and diverse streamer audience worldwide, supporting multiple languages and streaming platforms. Its market position is strong, with millions of active streamers and alerts, indicating significant adoption and brand recognition. The company, Zaya Solutions Limited, maintains a consistent brand identity and leverages partnerships with major social media and streaming platforms. Growth indicators include extensive user engagement metrics and active social media channels. Strategic observations suggest opportunities in expanding security transparency and enhancing direct customer contact channels.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data in the HTML. It uses secure OAuth-based authentication with multiple streaming platforms, enhancing user security. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of a published security.txt file or incident response contacts indicate gaps in security transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected in the content. Privacy compliance is supported by comprehensive policies and cookie consent mechanisms, but the lack of explicit security policy documentation and incident response information could impact user trust and regulatory compliance. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved by adopting best practices in security headers and public disclosure.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Create and maintain a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  3. Provide clear incident response and security contact information on the website to support timely communication and trust.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking services to minimize security risks and ensure privacy compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Zaya Solutions Limited
Description
DonationAlerts provides interactive tools and revenue-boosting features designed for streamers, enabling them to receive donations, show subscribers, set donation goals, run polls, and share media to enhance their streaming experience.
Key services
Donations, Subscriptions display, Donation goals, Polls, Media sharing
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Slick Carousel, Select2, Perfect Scrollbar, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Mail.ru counter
Frameworks
Vue.js
Platforms
Twitch, YouTube, Facebook, Discord, Dailymotion, Boosty, TikTok, Trovo, Telegram, GoodGame
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure authentication via OAuth platforms
  • Cookie consent banner present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Mail.ru counter
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Top.Mail.Ru
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Mail.ru counter
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Professional streaming donation platform targeting streamers globally
  3. Strong social media presence and integration with major streaming platforms
  4. Use of multiple third-party analytics and tracking services
  5. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found on main pages
  6. Legal and privacy documents are present and linked
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response information publicly available
  8. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust verification
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack with Vue.js as the primary framework, supplemented by jQuery and various UI libraries such as Slick Carousel and Select2. It integrates multiple analytics and tracking tools including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Mail.ru counters, indicating extensive user behavior tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and features responsive design with good SEO practices. Performance is moderate, with deferred loading of JavaScript chunks and optimized assets. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require ongoing security monitoring. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and accessibility compliance to reduce technical debt and enhance robustness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with donationalerts.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review donationalerts.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.