Skip to main content

Security report for domainnameservers.net

Buzix, Inc. · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 3 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Buzix, Inc. is a small, established web hosting provider with over 19 years of domain presence and claims of over three decades of service experience. The company offers a range of hosting services including shared, reseller, and dedicated servers, emphasizing ease of use, affordability, and reliable customer support. Their technical infrastructure is based on Linux servers with popular control panels like cPanel and WHM, supplemented by Softaculous for easy application installations. The website uses modern web technologies such as Bootstrap and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for user tracking and marketing insights. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage and CSRF tokens on login forms, but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, representing a compliance gap. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but could improve in privacy compliance and security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching domainnameservers.net

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Buzix targets individuals and businesses seeking reliable and affordable web hosting solutions. Their business model focuses on providing hosting plans with strong uptime guarantees and personalized support. The company leverages its long-standing market presence and technical expertise as competitive advantages. Revenue streams likely include hosting subscriptions and support services. The absence of social media and direct contact emails suggests a focus on direct customer portal interactions. The company maintains a comprehensive set of hosting and email configuration resources, indicating a mature support ecosystem. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. The website uses HTTPS and includes CSRF tokens in forms, which are positive indicators. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose the domain to DNS spoofing risks. No incident response or abuse contact information is published, limiting transparency in security management. Privacy and cookie policies are missing, which is a compliance and trust concern. Overall, the security posture is adequate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options to harden the website against attacks.
  3. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  4. Provide clear incident response and abuse contact information to enhance transparency and security readiness.
  5. Conduct a privacy impact assessment and update user tracking disclosures to align with privacy regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Buzix, Inc.
Description
Buzix provides web hosting services that are easy, friendly, and affordable. They offer hosting for personal and business websites on high-performance Linux servers with user-friendly control panels like cPanel and WHM. They provide one-click installations via Softaculous and emphasize excellent customer support and uptime.
Key services
Shared Hosting, Reseller Hosting, Dedicated Servers, Email Hosting and Configuration Support, Customer Support via Chat and Ticketing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Bootstrap (implied by navbar classes), jQuery (implied by Bootstrap usage), Softaculous (mentioned for script installs), Linux servers, cPanel and WHM
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Linux
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS for analytics and tag manager scripts
  • Login form uses POST with CSRF token
  • Client area login and registration forms present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Login and registration forms use CSRF tokens indicating some security awareness.
  4. Use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager indicates moderate user tracking.
  5. No phone numbers or email addresses explicitly listed on the homepage or footer.
  6. Footer contains many internal links but no direct contact emails or phone numbers.
  7. No social media links detected.
  8. Website content is focused on web hosting services with detailed descriptions and support resources.
  9. Domain WHOIS data is consistent and domain is long-established.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a custom PHP platform using Bootstrap for responsive design and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The hosting environment is Linux-based with cPanel and WHM control panels. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. The site lacks advanced SEO and accessibility optimizations. No CMS like WordPress or Joomla detected, indicating a custom or proprietary system. The domain registrar is Wild West Domains, LLC, and the domain is well protected with EPP status locks but lacks DNSSEC. The technical stack is stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with domainnameservers.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review domainnameservers.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.