Skip to main content

Security report for domaininfo.com

Abion AB · Technology · Sweden

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Domaininfo.com is a well-established domain registration service operated by Abion AB, a Swedish company founded in 1997. The website offers domain registration, transfer services, and trademark monitoring, targeting businesses and individuals seeking domain management solutions. The company is transitioning its services to a new platform, Abion Core, indicating ongoing modernization efforts. The website presents professional branding, clear contact information, and social media presence, supporting its market credibility. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript frameworks such as Knockout.js, integrates Google Analytics for user tracking, and is hosted with Oracle Cloud DNS services. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices but lacks advanced security configurations such as DNSSEC and security headers. Performance is moderate, and accessibility is basic but functional. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and has domain status prohibitions to prevent unauthorized changes. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers, along with limited privacy and security policy disclosures, represent areas for improvement. No critical vulnerabilities or WAF protections were detected, and the WHOIS data confirms the legitimacy and consistency of the domain registration. Overall, the website scores well in business credibility and content quality but has moderate technical and security posture scores. Strategic enhancements in security policies, DNSSEC implementation, and privacy compliance would strengthen trust and resilience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching domaininfo.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
25
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Abion AB operates Domaininfo.com as a domain registrar with a long-standing presence since 1997, positioning itself as a reliable provider in the domain registration market. Its business model centers on domain sales, transfers, and trademark clearinghouse services, catering primarily to businesses and domain investors. The company leverages partnerships, such as the Abion Core platform, to modernize its offerings. The presence of multiple currency options and language support indicates a broad international target audience. The company maintains a medium-sized operation with a clear physical presence in Sweden and active social media engagement, supporting customer trust and market reach.

Security posture

The security posture of Domaininfo.com is moderate. The site enforces domain status prohibitions to protect against unauthorized domain transfers and deletions, uses HTTPS for secure communications, and provides cookie consent mechanisms. However, the lack of DNSSEC leaves the domain vulnerable to DNS spoofing attacks. The absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces protection against common web attacks. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. Google Analytics tracking is implemented with cookie consent, but privacy policy details are basic and lack comprehensive GDPR compliance statements. Overall, the site is functional and reasonably secure but would benefit from enhanced security controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish a detailed security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  4. Develop and publish a comprehensive privacy policy with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  5. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting and improve security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Abion AB
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Abion AB
Description
Domaininfo registers domain names in all countries possible as well as in the international top level domains .com, .net .org, .biz, .info .name and others.
Key services
Domain name registration, Domain transfer services, Trademark clearinghouse monitoring
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Analytics, jQuery (implied by usage of Knockout.js bindings), Knockout.js (data-bind attributes), CSS3, HTML5
Frameworks
Knockout.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled (implied by https URLs)
  • Client and server domain status prohibitions to prevent unauthorized transfers and deletions

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a domain registrar service transitioning to a new platform (Abion Core).
  2. Clear contact information and social media presence enhance trust.
  3. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a security improvement opportunity.
  4. No explicit privacy or security policy pages beyond basic privacy WHOIS PDF.
  5. Use of Google Analytics indicates user tracking with cookie consent banner present.
  6. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  7. Website uses Knockout.js for dynamic UI bindings.
  8. Domain is close to expiry (14 days), which may require attention.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom CMS with JavaScript frameworks such as Knockout.js for dynamic content binding. Google Analytics is integrated for user behavior tracking. Hosting is supported by Oracle Cloud DNS services, indicating a reliable infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and responsive design. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers indicates technical debt in security hardening. Performance is moderate, with no critical errors detected. The site could benefit from modernization efforts focused on security enhancements and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with domaininfo.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review domaininfo.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.