Skip to main content

Security report for domain.link

Domain.link · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Domain.link is a specialized technology company offering a SaaS platform for domain portfolio management, including free DNS hosting, domain parking, marketplace management, geo redirects, and email forwarding. The platform targets domain investors and managers seeking to maximize revenue and streamline domain operations. The website is professionally designed with good mobile optimization and clear navigation, reflecting a focused business model in the domain management niche. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies such as ES modules, Tailwind CSS, Alpine.js, and integrates Google Analytics for user insights. The infrastructure appears robust with fast performance and responsive design. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and CSRF protection, though lacks some advanced security headers and explicit incident response policies. Privacy compliance is basic with privacy and cookie policies present but no explicit consent mechanism. Overall, the site is trustworthy with partner integrations and professional content but could improve in security transparency and privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching domain.link

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
60
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Domain.link occupies a niche market position as a domain management platform integrating multiple domain marketplaces and parking services. Its business model is SaaS-based, monetizing through domain portfolio management tools and services. The company targets domain investors and portfolio managers, offering key services such as free DNS hosting, parking optimization, marketplace listing management, geo redirects, and email services. Partnerships with established domain marketplaces like Afternic, Sedo, and Dan.com enhance its ecosystem and market reach. The platform's growth potential is supported by its technical infrastructure and integration capabilities. However, limited public business information and privacy-protected WHOIS data reduce transparency. The company demonstrates consistent branding and professional presentation, supporting credibility in its sector.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS, CSRF token implementation, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, it lacks several recommended security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. There is no visible security policy or incident response contact information, which limits transparency and readiness perception. Privacy compliance is partial; while privacy and cookie policies exist, there is no cookie consent mechanism, which may be a GDPR compliance gap. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files are present. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved with enhanced headers, explicit policies, and consent mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Add a dedicated security policy page and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Deploy a cookie consent mechanism to ensure GDPR compliance and improve privacy practices.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting and improve trust.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Domain.link
Description
Domain.link provides free DNS hosting, domain parking, marketplace management, geo redirects, mail forwarding with anycast load balancing, and domain portfolio management services.
Key services
Free DNS hosting, Domain parking, Marketplace management, Geo redirects, Mail forwarding, Custom reporting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript ES Modules, CSS3, HTML5, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Alpine.js (x-data, x-show directives)
Frameworks
Livewire (indicated by livewireScriptConfig), Tailwind CSS (utility classes), Feather Icons (SVG icons)
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF token present in meta tag
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and mobile optimized
  2. No visible forms collecting personal data on homepage
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present but lack explicit consent mechanisms
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies found
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics
  6. Partner logos indicate integration with reputable domain marketplaces
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern front-end technologies including ES modules, Tailwind CSS for styling, and Alpine.js for interactivity. The use of Livewire indicates a reactive component framework likely backed by a PHP backend. Google Analytics is integrated for user behavior tracking. The site is well optimized for mobile devices and loads quickly, indicating good performance practices. The HTML is valid and SEO meta tags are properly configured, supporting search engine visibility. There is no detected CMS, suggesting a custom or framework-based solution. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available. Overall, the technical implementation is modern and robust, with opportunities to improve security headers and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with domain.link. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review domain.link.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.