Skip to main content

Security report for dogado.partners

dogado.partners · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

dogado.partners is a specialized cloud and hosting service provider targeting system houses, web agencies, and ITK companies primarily in Germany. As part of the dogado.group, it leverages over 20 years of experience to offer tailored cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity, backup, and collaboration services through various partner programs. The company positions itself as a reliable partner enabling businesses to build and expand their own cloud and hosting offerings with expert support and flexible solutions. Technically, the website employs modern web standards including TLS 1.3, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism ensuring GDPR compliance. Security posture is solid with ISO 27001 certification and no known SSL vulnerabilities, though improvements such as enabling HSTS, DNSSEC, and DMARC could enhance protection. The site demonstrates high professionalism, excellent content quality, and strong trust signals including a high Trustpilot rating. Overall, dogado.partners presents a mature digital presence aligned with its business goals and compliance requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dogado.partners

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
65
Email security
80
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

dogado.partners operates in the technology sector focusing on cloud infrastructure and hosting services for partners and resellers. Its business model revolves around partner programs tailored for different customer segments including IT professionals, web professionals, and strategic partners. The company offers a broad portfolio of services such as virtual data centers, colocation, backup solutions, and collaboration tools like Microsoft 365 and Hosted Exchange. The presence of a strong partner ecosystem and detailed onboarding processes indicates a scalable and partner-centric approach. The company benefits from the backing of the dogado.group, enhancing market credibility and operational capacity. Growth indicators include active blog content, multiple partner program options, and a high volume of customer reviews. Strategic partnerships and a focus on compliance and security further strengthen its competitive position.

Security posture

The security maturity of dogado.partners is good, with key strengths including ISO 27001 certification, use of modern TLS protocols, and a valid SPF record for email security. The website employs a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements, reflecting a strong privacy culture. No critical vulnerabilities such as Heartbleed or FREAK were detected. However, the absence of DNSSEC, HSTS, OCSP stapling, and DMARC records represents compliance and security gaps that could be exploited. Incident response information and vulnerability disclosure policies are not publicly available, which may limit transparency. Overall, the security posture supports business continuity and data protection but would benefit from enhancements in DNS security and email authentication to mitigate phishing and DNS spoofing risks.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload to enforce HTTPS and prevent downgrade attacks.
  2. Implement DNSSEC to protect DNS queries from spoofing and cache poisoning.
  3. Add a DMARC record to improve email authentication and reduce phishing risks.
  4. Enable OCSP stapling on the SSL certificate to improve revocation checking performance and reliability.
  5. Publish a security.txt file and establish a clear vulnerability disclosure policy to enhance transparency and incident response readiness.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with modern web technologies including TLS 1.3 and 1.2 for secure transport, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and a consent management platform for privacy compliance. The hosting infrastructure is supported by cloudpit nameservers, indicating a cloud-based hosting environment. Performance metrics show moderate load times and a substantial number of resources, suggesting room for optimization. The site uses SVG icons, web fonts, and responsive design techniques ensuring good mobile optimization and accessibility. No common CMS was detected, implying a custom or proprietary platform. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and incomplete email authentication records, which could impact security and deliverability. Overall, the technical infrastructure is robust but could be improved with enhanced DNS and SSL configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dogado.partners. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dogado.partners.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.