Skip to main content

Security report for docfactory.com

SIGMA TECHNOLOGY ORIGO AB · Technology · Sweden

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sigma Technology Origo is a Sweden-based technology consulting company specializing in connecting business-critical information sources to empower data-driven decision making and personalized experiences. The company offers a range of services including Aftersales Digital Twin, Workshop solutions, Diagnostics, Renderpoint/Topicpack, and a cloud-based CCMS platform called Studio. It operates as part of the Sigma Technology Group, a global technology consulting firm with a presence in multiple countries and owned by Danir AB. The website content is professional and clearly targets businesses seeking advanced technology and digital solutions. Technically, the website uses standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript with jQuery, and is moderately optimized for mobile and performance. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS assumed but lacking explicit security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the domain is well-established and trustworthy, with no blocking or WAF detected.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching docfactory.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a mid-sized technology consulting firm with a strong focus on aftersales and product lifecycle digitalization. Its competitive advantage lies in integrating multiple data sources for enhanced customer-centric solutions and diagnostics. The business model revolves around providing expert consulting and cloud-based software solutions to industrial and technology sectors. The company benefits from its association with the larger Sigma Group, enhancing its market credibility and reach. Growth indicators include a broad service portfolio and international presence. The partnership ecosystem includes Sigma Technology Group and Sigma Group, both referenced on the website. Strategic observations suggest a focus on innovation in digital twin technology and smart content management to maintain competitive edge.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS in use but lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. No privacy or cookie policies are published, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not disclosed, which may impact readiness for security events. Forms are present but no explicit security controls or privacy notices are evident. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be significantly improved by adopting best practices in security headers, privacy compliance, and incident response transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Establish and disclose an incident response policy and vulnerability disclosure process to improve security transparency and readiness.
  4. Enhance form security by adding anti-CSRF tokens and clear privacy notices regarding data collection and processing.
  5. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIGMA TECHNOLOGY ORIGO AB
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIGMA TECHNOLOGY ORIGO AB
Description
Connect your most business-critical information sources in a multi-source solution to empower data-driven decision making and personalized experiences. Sigma Technology Group is a global technology consulting company offering expertise in software development, product information, embedded systems design & development, IT infrastructure development & administration, and digital solutions.
Key services
Aftersales Digital Twin, Workshop Solutions, Diagnostics, Renderpoint/Topicpack, Studio (Cloud-based CCMS platform)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, jQuery
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS assumed (URL is https)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Forms present with basic input fields

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the website.
  2. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address.
  3. Website content is professional and focused on technology consulting and digital solutions.
  4. No social media links explicitly found in the HTML content.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  6. Forms are present but no explicit security or privacy notices related to data collection.
  7. No security headers or advanced security policies detected in the provided data.
  8. WHOIS data shows a long-established domain with no privacy protection.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; content fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a straightforward technology stack with HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript including jQuery. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and performance, with a clear navigation structure and professional design. No CMS or advanced frameworks were detected, indicating a custom or lightweight implementation. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site lacks advanced SEO optimizations and accessibility features are basic. There is no evidence of analytics or tracking scripts, suggesting minimal user tracking. Technical risks include absence of security headers and missing privacy compliance elements, which could affect user trust and regulatory adherence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with docfactory.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review docfactory.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.