Skip to main content

Security report for divly.net

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Divly.net is a small technology service provider specializing in affordable and fast website building and SEO services targeted at a global audience including Europe and the USA. The company emphasizes quality, individual client approach, and rapid delivery with pricing starting at $99 for website development within 10 days. The website is built using modern JavaScript frameworks such as Vue.js and Nuxt.js, and integrates popular analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Yandex Metrika, and Google Optimize. Hosting and domain registration are managed through RU-CENTER with nameservers indicating Russian hosting infrastructure. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but lacking DNSSEC and security headers, and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies or consent mechanisms. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy transparency to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching divly.net

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Divly.net operates in the competitive website development and SEO services market, positioning itself as a cost-effective and rapid solution provider. The business model focuses on direct service delivery with additional bonuses to attract clients. The target customers are businesses and individuals worldwide seeking quick and affordable web presence solutions. The company was founded in 2018, consistent with domain registration data. There is no evidence of parent or subsidiary companies or formal certifications. The marketing ecosystem relies heavily on Google and Yandex tools for analytics and optimization. The lack of visible contact information and formal policies may limit credibility and customer trust. Growth potential exists if the company enhances transparency and security practices.

Security posture

The security maturity of Divly.net is basic. The site uses HTTPS, which is mandatory, but lacks DNSSEC and important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. No incident response or security policy pages are available, and no dedicated security contact channels are provided. The use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts introduces potential risk vectors that require regular auditing. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No critical vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected in the provided content. To improve security posture, the company should implement DNSSEC, security headers, publish security and incident response policies, and establish clear privacy compliance mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and build user trust.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to protect against common web attacks.
  4. Publish an incident response policy and provide dedicated security contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  5. Include clear and verified contact information on the website to improve business credibility and customer confidence.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Divly creates quality & unique websites worldwide. Fast completion, affordable pricing, individual approach to Client's needs. Developing a website in 10 days for $99. Order a website from us and get additional bonuses. Additionally, we offer help with your existing website and SEO services.
Key services
website building, website development, SEO setup, site promotion, existing website help
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Yandex Metrika, Google Optimize
Frameworks
Vue.js, Nuxt.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Yandex Metrika, Google Optimize
Marketing tools
Google Optimize
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website offers affordable and fast website development services.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Uses multiple analytics and marketing tools from Google and Yandex.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  5. No security or incident response policies publicly disclosed.
  6. No certifications or trust badges visible.
  7. Domain registration is consistent and legitimate.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on modern JavaScript frameworks Vue.js and Nuxt.js, indicating a contemporary front-end architecture. It leverages Google and Yandex analytics and marketing tools for user tracking and optimization. Hosting appears to be managed via RU-CENTER with Russian nameservers. Performance is moderate with preloading of scripts and responsive design elements. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO optimization is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, the absence of CMS identification suggests a custom or framework-based site rather than a traditional CMS. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts without visible security controls and lack of DNSSEC. Opportunities exist to improve security and privacy compliance, which would reduce technical debt and enhance operational resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with divly.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review divly.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.