Skip to main content

Security report for dima-stc.com

DIMA Software Technology Center GmbH · Technology · Austria

Partial score · DNS & email only

39/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DIMA Software Technology Center GmbH is a medium-sized Austrian IT company specializing in full-stack software development, consulting, quality assurance, and support services for international markets. Established in 2012, the company employs over 50 professionals at its Raaba (Graz) location. Their business model focuses on delivering tailored IT solutions and collaborating closely with clients to achieve business goals. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image targeting international business partners seeking reliable IT services. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Avada theme and several plugins such as Slider Revolution and BambooHR for job listings. Despite a rich content structure and good mobile optimization, the site suffers from slow performance due to a large page size and many resources. Accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic but functional. From a security perspective, the website has critical shortcomings. It lacks a valid SSL certificate and does not support HTTPS, exposing visitors to potential risks. No security headers or advanced configurations like HSTS or OCSP stapling are implemented. Privacy compliance is weak, with no privacy policy or terms of service found, though a cookie consent banner is present. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the site presents a moderate risk profile due to missing HTTPS and compliance gaps. Strategic improvements in security and privacy policies are essential to enhance trust and protect users. Performance optimization and SEO enhancements would also benefit the user experience and visibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

Checks completed
5of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dima-stc.com

This scan found 5 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
20
Average
39

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention dima-stc.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for dima-stc.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

DIMA positions itself as a reliable IT service provider with a focus on quality and customer collaboration. Their competitive advantage lies in experienced consultants, certified specialists, and a comprehensive service portfolio covering consulting, development, QA, and support. The company targets international markets and emphasizes flexible service offerings, from individual components to full product lifecycle management. BambooHR integration indicates structured HR processes, though currently no open positions are listed. The company maintains a professional online presence with clear contact channels and social media engagement via Facebook. Growth indicators include a stable employee base and a consistent brand image. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the website data.

Security posture

The current security posture is weak due to the absence of HTTPS and a valid SSL certificate, which is a critical vulnerability. The lack of security headers and modern TLS protocols further exposes the site to potential attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, indicating limited preparedness for security incidents. Privacy compliance is insufficient, lacking a privacy policy and terms of service, which may lead to regulatory risks under GDPR. The presence of a cookie consent banner is a positive but minimal compliance indicator. Overall, the site requires urgent security enhancements to protect user data and improve trustworthiness.

Recommendations

  1. Install and configure a valid SSL certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Implement essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Develop and publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service documents to ensure GDPR compliance.
  4. Conduct regular security audits and establish an incident response plan including vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.
  5. Optimize website performance by reducing page size and resource count, and improve SEO and accessibility features.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
DIMA Software Technology Center GmbH
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a mature WordPress CMS platform using the Avada theme and several plugins including Slider Revolution and BambooHR. The tech stack includes PHP and jQuery with modern UI elements. However, the site suffers from slow load times (over 21 seconds) and a large page size (~2.8 MB) with 406 resources, indicating technical debt and optimization opportunities. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility and SEO are basic. Hosting details are unclear but the IP address suggests a small or self-hosted environment. No CDN or advanced caching mechanisms are detected. The absence of HTTPS and security headers represents a significant technical risk. Overall, modernization and performance tuning are recommended to enhance user experience and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dima-stc.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dima-stc.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.