Skip to main content

Security report for digiturvamalli.fi

Cyberday Oy · Technology · Finland

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Cyberday Oy operates the Digiturvamalli.fi platform, a Finnish SaaS solution designed to simplify cybersecurity compliance and management for organizations, particularly targeting IT and security managers. The platform supports multiple international and national security frameworks such as ISO 27001, GDPR, NIS2, and others, providing a unified, step-by-step approach to achieving and demonstrating compliance. The service integrates with Microsoft Teams to bring security tasks closer to daily workflows, enhancing collaboration and ease of use. Cyberday Oy positions itself as a trusted provider with recognized certifications and a growing international presence under the Cyberday brand.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching digiturvamalli.fi

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention digiturvamalli.fi, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for digiturvamalli.fi right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Cyberday Oy holds a strong position in the Finnish cybersecurity compliance market, leveraging a comprehensive content library and automated reporting tools to reduce complexity and manual effort for clients. Their business model is subscription-based SaaS, offering free trials and demos to attract customers. The company maintains active engagement through webinars, blogs, and newsletters, supporting customer education and retention. Partnerships and a partner program indicate a strategic approach to ecosystem growth. The company’s focus on multiple compliance frameworks and integration with popular collaboration tools provides a competitive advantage in the evolving regulatory landscape.

Security posture

The website and platform demonstrate a mature security posture with HTTPS enforcement, robust security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The presence of ISO 27001 and GDPR alignment certifications further attest to their commitment to security best practices. However, the absence of a publicly available incident response policy and security.txt file suggests areas for improvement in transparency and vulnerability management. Integration with Microsoft Teams and Slack indicates secure collaboration capabilities, while cookie consent and privacy policies reflect compliance with privacy regulations. Overall, Cyberday Oy exhibits a strong security culture suitable for its business domain.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated incident response policy and provide clear contact channels for security incidents.
  2. Implement and publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  3. Consider adding Data Protection Officer contact information to enhance GDPR transparency.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate supply chain risks.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve inclusivity and compliance with standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Cyberday Oy
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Cyberday Oy
Description
Digiturvamalli purkaa valitsemanne vaatimuskehikot (mm. ISO 27001, tiedonhallintalaki, Katakri) selkeiksi digiturvatehtäviksi ja tuo niiden toteutustyön lähelle arkea - Microsoft Teamsiin.
Key services
Tietoturvan hallintajärjestelmän rakentaminen, Vaatimuskehikkojen hallinta (ISO 27001, GDPR, NIS2, jne.), Tehtävien ja ohjeistusten hallinta, Automaattinen raportointi, Riskienhallinta, Sisäinen auditointi, Henkilöstön koulutus ja ohjeistus
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Intercom, LinkedIn Insight Tag, CookieYes Consent Management, Microsoft Teams integration, jQuery, Epic Spinners JS
Frameworks
ISO 27001, NIST CSF, GDPR, NIS2, SOC 2, CSA CCM, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, ISO 27701, Cyber Essentials
Platforms
Webflow, Microsoft Teams
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers
  • Secure forms with validation
  • Integration with Microsoft Teams for secure collaboration

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads, LinkedIn Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
Intercom, ShareThis, Kiflo
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Strong focus on simplifying cybersecurity compliance for organizations.
  3. Comprehensive coverage of multiple security frameworks and standards.
  4. Integration with Microsoft Teams enhances collaboration and usability.
  5. Multiple forms for newsletter subscription and contact with proper validation.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  7. Clear privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  8. Presence of certifications and trust badges boosts credibility.
  9. Active social media presence on LinkedIn, Twitter, and Facebook.
  10. No signs of suspicious or malicious content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, leveraging modern web technologies including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and various marketing and analytics tools such as Facebook Pixel and LinkedIn Insight Tag. Hosting is via Amazon CloudFront CDN, contributing to fast performance and global availability. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good SEO practices. Integration with Microsoft Teams and Slack for task management reflects a modern approach to platform interoperability. No technical debt or outdated libraries were detected, indicating a well-maintained infrastructure. Opportunities exist to further improve accessibility and streamline third-party script usage for enhanced security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with digiturvamalli.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review digiturvamalli.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.