Skip to main content

Security report for digitrace.de

DigiTrace GmbH · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DigiTrace GmbH is a specialized IT-forensics and IT-security service provider based in Germany, offering a broad range of services including IT forensics, incident response, eDiscovery, and expert IT assessments. The company targets businesses, authorities, auditors, and legal professionals, positioning itself as a trusted expert in IT security and forensic investigations. The website is professionally designed using Joomla CMS and includes detailed service descriptions and contact information, although it lacks some modern security configurations. Technically, the site suffers from the absence of a valid SSL certificate, resulting in no HTTPS support, which significantly impacts its security posture. Other security best practices such as security headers and HSTS are also missing. Privacy compliance is addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy and DMARC/SPF email protections, but no cookie consent mechanism is present. Overall, the site is functional and informative but requires urgent improvements in security infrastructure to meet modern standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching digitrace.de

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
18
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

DigiTrace GmbH operates in the technology sector focusing on IT forensics and security consulting. Its business model revolves around providing expert services to a niche market including companies, government agencies, and legal entities. The company leverages its expertise to publish articles and conduct training, enhancing its market credibility. The website reflects a small-sized enterprise with consistent branding and good content quality. The lack of visible certifications or security policies suggests room for growth in formal compliance and trust-building measures. The hosting and DNS setup indicate reliance on Namesecure services. No partnerships or subsidiaries are explicitly identified from the website content.

Security posture

The security posture of the DigiTrace.de website is weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support, exposing users to potential interception risks. The lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS further reduces protection against common web attacks. DNS security features like DNSSEC and CAA are not enabled, increasing risk exposure. Email security is partially addressed with SPF and DMARC policies, which is positive. No incident response contact or vulnerability disclosure policy is found on the site. Overall, the site requires immediate remediation of SSL/TLS issues and implementation of standard security headers to improve its security maturity and protect client trust.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire website.
  2. Implement essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Enable HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload to enforce secure connections.
  4. Add a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and improve user trust.
  5. Publish a clear security policy and vulnerability disclosure program to enhance transparency and incident response readiness.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Joomla CMS with common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and carouFredSel for sliders. The DNS setup uses Namesecure nameservers without DNSSEC or CAA records. Performance is suboptimal with a load time exceeding 7 seconds and a large page size over 1 MB, indicating potential optimization opportunities. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic but functional. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured navigation. The absence of HTTPS and modern TLS protocols is a critical technical deficiency. The site does not utilize advanced frameworks or platforms beyond Joomla and standard web technologies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with digitrace.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review digitrace.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.