Skip to main content

Security report for digitaldrang.de

digitaldrang · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

digitaldrang is a German-based company specializing in modular SaaS e-commerce solutions designed to enhance online shop performance through tools such as product search, image optimization, real-time translation, cache optimization, and product information management. The company targets e-commerce businesses seeking scalable and high-performance digital tools. The website is built on WordPress with Elementor and integrates marketing and analytics tools like HubSpot and Google Tag Manager, alongside a cookie consent mechanism via Usercentrics. The technical infrastructure leverages Cloudflare for DNS and security, indicating a modern and secure hosting environment. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is partial due to the absence of a visible privacy policy and terms of service pages. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy front with room for improvement in security and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching digitaldrang.de

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

digitaldrang operates in the technology and e-commerce sectors, offering SaaS solutions that improve online shop functionalities. Their business model focuses on providing modular tools that integrate seamlessly with existing e-commerce platforms. The company appears to be small-sized with a focused market niche in Germany. Their use of HubSpot and Google Tag Manager suggests active marketing and customer engagement strategies. The absence of detailed company registration or VAT information on the website limits deeper business intelligence. The presence of a contact form without direct emails or phone numbers indicates a controlled communication channel. The company maintains a consistent brand image and leverages modern web technologies to maintain competitive positioning.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and Cloudflare DNS usage. Cookie consent is managed via Usercentrics, supporting GDPR compliance efforts. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could hinder rapid response to security events. The integration of third-party marketing and analytics scripts requires ongoing monitoring to prevent vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or known vulnerabilities were detected in the provided content. Enhancing security documentation and headers would improve the security culture and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the website against common attacks.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to demonstrate preparedness and transparency.
  4. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular audits to improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
digitaldrang
Description
Modular, schnell, skalierbar – digitaldrang bietet smarte Tools zur Produktsuche, Bildoptimierung, Übersetzung & mehr. Jetzt Shop-Performance steigern!
Key services
Produktsuche (Product Search), Bildoptimierung (Image Optimization), Übersetzung (Real-time Translation), Cache Optimization, Produktdatenpflege (Product Information Management), Server-Side Tagging
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.7.4, Elementor 3.27.2, Elementor Pro 3.1.0, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot scripts, Usercentrics CMP, Cloudflare DNS and Nameservers
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS
  • Cookie consent via Usercentrics

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
HubSpot tracking pixel, Facebook pixel
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Usercentrics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional e-commerce SaaS provider based in Germany.
  2. Uses modern WordPress CMS with Elementor builder.
  3. Implements cookie consent via Usercentrics.
  4. Integrates HubSpot and Google Tag Manager for marketing and analytics.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content; contact form is present.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  8. No visible security headers detected in the provided data.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
  10. Domain uses Cloudflare nameservers indicating use of CDN and security services.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using Elementor and Elementor Pro for design and layout. It integrates multiple third-party services including HubSpot for marketing automation and analytics, Google Tag Manager for tag management, and Usercentrics for cookie consent management. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. The site shows good mobile optimization and SEO practices with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and accessibility. The technical stack is current but would benefit from enhanced security headers and formalized security documentation to reduce risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with digitaldrang.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review digitaldrang.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.