Skip to main content

Security report for digitalbridge.com

DigitalBridge · Technology · N/a

Low risk. No critical or high findings.

Security score

86/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DigitalBridge is a global alternative asset manager specializing in investments in next-generation digital infrastructure and Generative AI technologies. The company positions itself as a leader in the digital infrastructure investment space, targeting investors and digital infrastructure professionals. Their business model focuses on managing assets and portfolios in data centers, fiber networks, macro cell towers, edge infrastructure, and small cell networks. The website reflects a mature digital presence with multimedia content showcasing portfolio companies and investment highlights. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks such as Bootstrap and Video.js, integrates Google Fonts, and employs Cookiebot for cookie consent management, indicating a commitment to privacy compliance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though some security headers are not explicitly detected. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain registration trust analysis, but the professional design, comprehensive privacy policies, and investor relations content support legitimacy. Overall, the website is well-structured, compliant, and trustworthy, serving its target audience effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • Medium

      Missing X-XSS-Protection header

      Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

      What to do: Add "X-XSS-Protection: 1; mode=block"

    • Medium

      Missing Permissions-Policy header

      Controls browser features and APIs

      What to do: Implement a Permissions-Policy to restrict feature access

      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Permissions-Policy: accelerometer=(), autoplay=(), camera=(), cross-origin-isolated=(),…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Medium

      Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

      Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

      What to do: Update privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR requirements and user rights

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Medium

      No MTA-STS Policy

      MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

      What to do: Implement MTA-STS to prevent downgrade attacks

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Medium

      SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

      SSL certificate expires in 85 days

      What to do: Plan SSL certificate renewal

Keep watching digitalbridge.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
75
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
86

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

DigitalBridge operates in the technology and real estate sectors, focusing on digital infrastructure investments. Their market position as a leading global alternative asset manager is supported by a large asset base (~$106B) and a broad portfolio of companies. The company leverages a business model centered on asset management and venture investments in digital infrastructure. Their target customers include institutional investors and digital infrastructure professionals. The website's investor relations section and regulatory filings indicate transparency and compliance. Partnerships with platforms like LinkedIn and Salesforce for marketing and tracking suggest a sophisticated marketing ecosystem. Growth indicators include multimedia presentations and a focus on AI and next-gen infrastructure. The company maintains a consistent brand image and professional content, reinforcing its market credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security were not identified, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. There is no publicly visible security policy or incident response contact information, and no vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file was found. The absence of WHOIS data limits the ability to fully assess domain registration trustworthiness. Overall, the site is secure for general use but could improve transparency and security header implementation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance web security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or publish a security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance WHOIS data transparency or use verified domain registration to improve trust signals.
  5. Continue maintaining comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear user consent mechanisms.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
DigitalBridge
Description
DigitalBridge is a leading global alternative asset manager dedicated to investing in next-generation digital infrastructure and GenerativeAI.
Key services
Investment management, Digital infrastructure asset ownership, Portfolio management, Venture investments
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, Video.js, Google Fonts, Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager, Pardot
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag, Pardot
Marketing tools
Pardot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Professional and modern design with multimedia content
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms
  4. No direct company emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content
  5. Contact available via contact page with form
  6. No explicit security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain registration trust analysis
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, Video.js for video playback, Google Fonts for typography, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. Google Tag Manager and Pardot are used for analytics and marketing automation, indicating a mature digital marketing infrastructure. The site is mobile optimized with good accessibility and SEO practices. Performance is moderate with multimedia content but no significant delays or errors detected. No CMS was explicitly identified. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML content. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and user-friendly experience with room for security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with digitalbridge.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review digitalbridge.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.