Skip to main content

Security report for digitalberry.pl

DigitalBerry · Technology · Poland

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DigitalBerry is a small Polish technology company specializing in designing dedicated internet solutions such as CMS, ERP, CRM systems, online stores, websites, and web/mobile applications. The website content is primarily marketing-focused, targeting businesses seeking custom internet solutions. The company presents itself as a service provider with a modest online presence and limited content depth. Technically, the website uses standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, and the Slick Carousel library for UI elements. The site shows basic mobile optimization and moderate performance but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. There is no evidence of a CMS or hosting provider from the provided data. From a security perspective, the site does not disclose any security policies, incident response contacts, or certifications. There is no visible enforcement of HTTPS or security headers, which lowers the security posture. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating poor privacy compliance. Contact information is provided clearly, but no active forms or user data collection mechanisms are enabled. Overall, the website is functional but basic, with moderate trustworthiness. The lack of privacy and security policies, combined with minimal content and no active user engagement features, suggests room for improvement in professionalism and compliance. The domain WHOIS data is consistent with the business claims, supporting legitimacy but no privacy protection is used.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching digitalberry.pl

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention digitalberry.pl, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
14
Employees
0
Customers
2
Third parties
12
Weak passwords
29%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for digitalberry.pl.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

DigitalBerry operates in the technology sector, focusing on custom software and web development services for small to medium-sized businesses in Poland. Their market positioning is modest, with a focus on delivering tailored CMS, ERP, CRM, e-commerce, and application solutions. The business model is service-oriented, relying on client projects rather than product sales. There is no evidence of partnerships, subsidiaries, or parent companies. The website content and structure suggest a company in early growth or stable small business phase, with limited digital marketing or analytics integration. Revenue streams likely come from project-based contracts. The absence of social media or extensive contact details limits outreach and brand visibility.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low to moderate. The absence of HTTPS enforcement and security headers is a significant gap. No privacy or cookie policies indicate non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanism. The website does not expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries, which is positive. However, the lack of active forms and user input reduces attack surface but also limits user engagement. Overall, the security culture appears minimal, with no explicit security best practices communicated. This poses risks for data protection and user trust, especially if the company handles client data in projects.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  3. Introduce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Develop and publish an incident response policy and provide security contact channels.
  5. Activate and secure contact forms with proper validation and spam protection to enhance user engagement.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
DigitalBerry
Description
DigitalBerry designs dedicated internet solutions including CMS, ERP, CRM systems, online stores, websites, and web/mobile applications.
Key services
CMS, ERP, CRM systems, Online stores, Websites, Web and mobile applications
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, Slick Carousel
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is in Polish language with some English elements.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information includes a company email and phone number clearly labeled.
  4. No social media links or physical addresses provided.
  5. Site uses common web libraries like jQuery and Slick Carousel for UI.
  6. No visible analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  7. No forms are active; contact form fields are commented out.
  8. No security headers or HTTPS enforcement information available from provided data.
  9. Content is minimal and mostly marketing-oriented with placeholders for portfolio and news.
  10. No certifications or security policies disclosed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple technology stack with HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, and Slick Carousel for UI components. The site lacks a detected CMS or advanced frameworks. Performance is moderate with some responsiveness for mobile devices. SEO and accessibility features are basic, with minimal meta tags and no ARIA attributes detected. The site does not integrate analytics or tracking services, limiting data-driven insights. There is no evidence of modern JavaScript frameworks or backend technologies. Technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities exist to improve SEO, accessibility, and security. Hosting provider details are not available from the provided data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with digitalberry.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review digitalberry.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.