Skip to main content

Security report for digital.je

Digital Jersey · Technology · Jersey

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Digital Jersey is a prominent technology hub based in Jersey, focused on fostering the growth of the island's digital industries. It provides strategic support, digital skills training, and community engagement initiatives to nurture innovation and attract inward investment. The organization positions itself as a central player in Jersey's digital ecosystem, offering membership programs and hosting events to connect digital entrepreneurs and businesses. The website infrastructure is built on WordPress, leveraging modern technologies such as Google Tag Manager, HubSpot, Algolia search, and Cookiebot for consent management. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices, features comprehensive SEO metadata, and integrates various analytics and marketing tools to monitor and enhance user engagement. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced, use of reCAPTCHA for form protection, and a robust cookie consent mechanism. While some security headers are not explicitly detected, no critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies, and GDPR adherence is evident. Overall, Digital Jersey presents a trustworthy and professional digital presence with a solid technical foundation and compliance posture. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing explicit security policies, and maintaining vigilance on third-party scripts to sustain security and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching digital.je

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Digital Jersey operates as an essential entity within Jersey's technology sector, serving digital businesses, startups, investors, and the broader community. Its competitive advantage lies in its comprehensive support ecosystem, including initiatives like Impact Jersey, Sandbox Jersey, and Fintech & Regtech clusters. The business model revolves around membership services, digital skills development, and facilitating inward investment. Revenue streams likely include membership fees, event sponsorships, and government or partner funding. The target customers are digital entrepreneurs, SMEs, and organizations seeking digital transformation support. Growth indicators include active event hosting, training programs, and a growing member directory. The partnership ecosystem includes major platforms like HubSpot, Google, and social media channels, enhancing outreach and service delivery. The organization's operations reflect a strategic focus on innovation, skills enhancement, and community building within the digital economy of Jersey.

Security posture

Digital Jersey demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, integration of Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate bot and spam risks, and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism via Cookiebot ensuring user privacy and compliance. No exposed credentials or sensitive data were detected in the website content. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy suggests room for improvement in defense-in-depth strategies. Incident response and security policy documentation are not publicly available, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and readiness. Compliance with GDPR is evident through privacy and cookie policies, but explicit incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure programs are missing. Overall, the security culture appears proactive but would benefit from formalized policies and enhanced header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy to strengthen protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan accessible to users and partners to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate risks from vulnerable components.
  4. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Maintain continuous monitoring and staff training to foster a strong security culture and compliance adherence.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Digital Jersey Limited
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Digital Jersey
Description
Digital Jersey is a world-leading tech hub that develops strategies to help our on-Island digital industry thrive and remove barriers for inward investors.
Key services
Digital industry growth support, Membership programs, Digital skills training and courses, Inward investment facilitation, Digital initiatives like Impact Jersey, Sandbox Jersey, Fintech & Regtech
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Cookiebot, HubSpot, Vimeo player, Algolia search, reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent with Cookiebot
  • No exposed sensitive data found

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, HubSpot tracking pixel, Cookiebot tracking
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy mechanisms are implemented.
  3. Multiple digital initiatives and membership options indicate active community engagement.
  4. Use of modern technologies and analytics tools.
  5. No critical security issues detected.
  6. Social media presence is strong and consistent.
  7. Content is rich, relevant, and updated with recent news and events.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing a modern tech stack including Google Tag Manager, HubSpot marketing and analytics tools, Algolia for search functionality, Vimeo for video content, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The site features responsive design optimized for mobile devices and includes accessibility considerations. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and use of CDN-hosted resources. The presence of structured data (JSON-LD) enhances SEO and content discoverability. Technical debt appears minimal, with up-to-date libraries and no visible deprecated technologies. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and optimize loading times further. The technical infrastructure supports the business goals effectively, providing a solid foundation for digital engagement and growth.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with digital.je. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review digital.je.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.