Skip to main content

Security report for digishop.lv

Baltic Security Solution SIA · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DigiShop.lv is an e-commerce website operated by Baltic Security Solution SIA, specializing in the sale of security and safety systems including surveillance cameras, fire safety devices, and access control products primarily targeting the Latvian market. The website offers a catalog of products with user account functionality and integrates customer support via live chat. The business model focuses on retail sales of technology products related to security and safety. Technically, the site uses legacy JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 1.11.1 and jQuery UI 1.11.4, with tracking implemented through Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager. Hosting is provided by YourHost.lv, and the site includes cookie consent mechanisms indicating some level of privacy compliance. However, visible backend database errors suggest stability and security concerns that could impact user trust and operational continuity. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts domain legitimacy verification, though the website content and business information appear consistent with a legitimate small business. Overall, the site demonstrates moderate digital maturity but requires technical and security improvements to enhance reliability and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching digishop.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Baltic Security Solution SIA positions itself as a local Latvian retailer specializing in security systems and related technology products. The company targets customers seeking surveillance, fire safety, and access control solutions. The business operates an online store with product listings, pricing, and user account management. Partnerships with local hosting and development providers are evident. The company leverages standard web analytics and customer engagement tools but lacks visible certifications or advanced security policies. Growth potential may be limited by technical debt and backend issues. The absence of social media presence and limited contact information may constrain marketing reach and customer engagement. The company appears focused on serving a niche market within Latvia with a straightforward e-commerce model.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate security posture with HTTPS usage implied by external script sources but lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS. The presence of backend MySQL errors exposed on the front end is a significant security concern, potentially revealing internal system details to attackers and indicating poor error handling. Forms for login and registration exist but no explicit CSRF or input validation mechanisms are visible. Cookie consent is implemented, supporting privacy compliance. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The site would benefit from a comprehensive security audit, improved error handling, and implementation of security best practices to reduce risk and enhance user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Resolve backend database errors and implement robust error handling to prevent information leakage.
  2. Implement and enforce security headers such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Upgrade JavaScript libraries to current versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  4. Conduct a security audit focusing on form protections, input validation, and session management.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by providing clear data retention policies and a dedicated data protection officer contact.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Baltic Security Solution SIA
Description
DigiShop SIA. Mēs - Jūsu komforts un drošība!
Key services
Security systems, Video surveillance, Fire safety, Communication systems, Control systems, LED projectors, Materials and accessories, Network products
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.11.1, jQuery UI 1.11.4, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (ga.js), Tawk.to live chat, jQuery Form plugin
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS assumed (due to GTM and external scripts loaded over HTTPS)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Login form with password field

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Tawk.to live chat
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an e-commerce platform selling security and safety systems in Latvia.
  2. Site uses older jQuery versions and some outdated scripts.
  3. Visible backend error messages indicate database stability issues.
  4. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present and implemented.
  6. No explicit security headers detected in provided data.
  7. No email addresses found in the HTML content.
  8. Phone number +371 676-274-66 is clearly presented as company contact.
  9. No social media links detected.
  10. Site includes login and registration forms, indicating user accounts.
Technical notes

Notes

The website relies on older versions of jQuery and jQuery UI, which may expose it to known vulnerabilities. It uses Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking and Tawk.to for live chat support. Hosting is provided by YourHost.lv, a Latvian hosting provider. The site shows signs of moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. The HTML structure includes legacy conditional comments for IE browsers, indicating dated front-end code. SEO and accessibility features are basic but present. The visible backend error messages suggest technical debt and potential instability in the database layer. Modernization of the technology stack and improved error management are recommended to enhance reliability and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with digishop.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review digishop.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.