Skip to main content

Security report for dig.at

DIG GmbH · Technology · Austria

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DIG GmbH is a medium-sized Austrian company specializing in digital spend management solutions across Source2Pay, Finance, and Supply Chain sectors. As part of the Proalpha Group, DIG offers ERP-independent software and consulting services targeting enterprises seeking to optimize procurement and financial processes. The website demonstrates a professional and consistent brand presence with comprehensive content, customer testimonials, and references from reputable clients. Technically, the site is built on the HubSpot CMS platform, utilizing modern marketing and analytics tools such as HubSpot Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for consent management. However, a critical security issue is the absence of a valid SSL certificate, resulting in no HTTPS support, which significantly impacts the site's security posture. Performance is also suboptimal with a high load time and resource count. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is credible and well-positioned in its market but requires urgent security improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dig.at

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
45
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

DIG GmbH operates in the technology and manufacturing sectors, focusing on digital transformation in procurement and spend management. Its business model revolves around providing best-of-breed software solutions and consulting services that integrate with various ERP systems. The company leverages its affiliation with the Proalpha Group to enhance its market position and offer interdisciplinary solutions. The target audience includes medium to large enterprises in Austria and neighboring regions, particularly those facing challenges in supply chain efficiency, regulatory compliance, and cost optimization. The extensive list of references and testimonials from well-known companies indicates strong market acceptance and a robust partnership ecosystem. The company emphasizes agility, technology independence, and strategic consulting to drive growth and competitive advantage.

Security posture

The current security posture of the website is weak due to the lack of a valid SSL certificate and absence of HTTPS, exposing users to potential data interception risks. No security headers are detected, and advanced SSL features like HSTS, OCSP stapling, and session resumption are not enabled. While no known vulnerabilities or malware are identified, the missing HTTPS is a critical issue that undermines trust and compliance. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms are properly implemented, indicating awareness of data protection requirements. However, the absence of explicit security policies or incident response information suggests limited transparency in security governance. Immediate remediation of SSL/TLS issues and enhancement of security headers are recommended to improve the overall security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire website.
  2. Implement essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload directives.
  4. Optimize website performance by reducing resource count and improving load times.
  5. Enhance transparency by publishing a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the HubSpot CMS platform, utilizing JavaScript libraries including jQuery and Flickity for UI components. It integrates marketing and analytics tools such as HubSpot Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. However, the page load time is significantly slow (over 21 seconds) with a high number of resources (207) and large page size (~197 KB). The absence of a valid SSL certificate limits secure communications. The DNS setup is standard with no DNSSEC or CAA records enabled. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a modern marketing approach but requires improvements in security and performance to reduce technical debt and operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dig.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dig.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.