Skip to main content

Security report for diatomenterprises.com

Diatom Enterprises · Technology · Latvia

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Diatom Enterprises is a well-established Latvian custom software development and IT consulting company founded in 2004. With over 20 years of experience, the company offers a broad range of services including web, mobile, and desktop development, leveraging technologies such as React, Angular, .NET Core, Node.js, Ruby, and PHP. Their market position is strong, supported by long-term contracts, a skilled team of over 80 developers, and international presence including offices in Latvia and the US. The company targets businesses seeking tailored software solutions across various industries including fintech, logistics, real estate, and education. Technically, the website is built on WordPress and employs modern web technologies and frameworks. The site is mobile optimized, well-structured, and includes SEO best practices. Performance is moderate with good accessibility features. The company uses Google Tag Manager and other marketing tools, with a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism in place. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and domain registration protections such as clientTransferProhibited status. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and some security headers are not explicitly detected. There is no publicly available security policy or incident response contact, and no vulnerability disclosure policy was found. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be improved with additional measures. Overall, Diatom Enterprises presents a professional, trustworthy, and credible online presence with strong business and technical foundations. Strategic recommendations include enhancing DNS security, publishing security policies, and adding vulnerability disclosure mechanisms to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching diatomenterprises.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Diatom Enterprises operates in the technology sector focusing on custom software development and IT consulting. Their competitive advantage lies in their long-standing market presence since 2004, a skilled multilingual development team, and a diverse technology stack. Their business model revolves around delivering bespoke software solutions tailored to client needs across multiple industries such as fintech, logistics, real estate, and education. Revenue streams likely include project-based contracts and dedicated development teams. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem, including Microsoft Gold Partner status and recognition on Clutch. Growth indicators include a large portfolio of projects, long-term client relationships, and active recruitment. Their international footprint with offices in Latvia and the US supports global client servicing.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS, domain transfer protection, and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. However, the absence of DNSSEC and explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options indicates room for improvement. No incident response or security contact information is publicly available, which could hinder timely vulnerability reporting and mitigation. The lack of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file reduces transparency for security researchers. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the security maturity is good but would benefit from formalized policies and enhanced technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve overall DNS security.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and provide dedicated incident response contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses).
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerable components are used and maintain up-to-date dependencies.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Diatom Enterprises
Description
Diatom Enterprises is a Latvian custom software development and IT consulting company offering Web, Mobile and Desktop development services.
Key services
Custom Software Development, Web Development, Mobile Development, Desktop Development, AI Development, API Development, UX/UI Development, DevOps Services, Maintenance & Support
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Angular, .NET Core, Node.js, Ruby, PHP, Terraform
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web, Mobile, Desktop
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (implied), Facebook Pixel (commented out)
Marketing tools
Complianz GDPR Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. Strong presence of trust indicators including certifications and testimonials.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy in place.
  4. No visible security vulnerabilities or WAF blocking.
  5. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and long-term operation.
  6. Social media presence is consistent and linked.
  7. No terms of service page found, which could be improved.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing modern front-end technologies including React, Angular, and .NET Core for their software development services. The site loads external scripts such as Google Tag Manager and jQuery, and uses a cookie consent plugin (Complianz GDPR). Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO meta tags. The hosting and domain registration are stable and consistent with the company's history. Some technical debt is implied by the absence of advanced security headers and DNSSEC. The site is well-structured with clear navigation and professional design, supporting a positive user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with diatomenterprises.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review diatomenterprises.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.