Skip to main content

Security report for bogavante-loco.dg1.com

DG1 · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DG1 is an AI-driven technology company providing an all-in-one platform for AI voice-controlled web and e-commerce solutions aimed primarily at SMEs. The platform offers a comprehensive suite of services including dynamic website CMS, advanced e-commerce features, marketing automation, booking systems, and mobile applications for Android and iOS. The company positions itself as an innovative digital partner to help businesses grow by leveraging AI and automation. Technically, the website uses modern JavaScript frameworks such as Vue.js, integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools, and is hosted likely on AWS infrastructure. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer lock active, but lacks DNSSEC and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and terms of service pages. Overall, the domain is well-established with consistent WHOIS data supporting legitimacy. Recommendations include enhancing privacy compliance, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing security and incident response policies to improve trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bogavante-loco.dg1.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
40
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention bogavante-loco.dg1.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
21
Employees
0
Customers
21
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
19%

7 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for bogavante-loco.dg1.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

DG1 targets the SME segment with a SaaS business model offering AI-powered web and e-commerce solutions. Its competitive advantage lies in integrating AI voice control and automation into digital presence management. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees for platform access and additional services. The company leverages partnerships with payment gateways, logistics providers, and marketing platforms like Zapier. The presence on Product Hunt and mobile app stores indicates active marketing and product development. The multilingual website suggests a global or regional expansion strategy. The lack of direct contact emails or phone numbers may indicate a focus on digital self-service or lead capture via forms.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and domain transfer lock is enabled, which are positive indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC reduces DNS security. No explicit privacy, security, or incident response policies are published, which is a compliance and transparency gap. The site uses multiple third-party scripts for analytics and marketing, which increases the attack surface and requires regular auditing. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The lack of a security.txt file or dedicated security contact channels limits vulnerability disclosure readiness. Overall, the security posture is adequate but can be improved with better policy transparency and DNS security enhancements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Add a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and legal protections.
  4. Implement a security.txt file and provide clear incident response contact information.
  5. Audit and monitor third-party scripts regularly to mitigate risks from external dependencies.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
DG1
Description
DG1 is an innovative AI-driven company offering a comprehensive all-in-one platform that revolutionizes AI Voice-Controlled Web & Ecommerce solutions to empower businesses, especially SMEs, to grow digitally, reduce costs, and access online opportunities.
Key services
AI Voice-Controlled Web & Ecommerce platform, Dynamic Website CMS, Advanced E-Commerce with promotions engine, Marketing tools including multichannel campaigns, Booking and scheduling system, Mobile app for Android and iOS, AI Virtual Assistant, Payment gateway integrations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Vue.js, JavaScript, Slick Carousel, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, OneSignal, Facebook Pixel, AWS DNS
Frameworks
Vue.js
Platforms
Web, Android, iOS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain transfer lock enabled
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of modern analytics and tracking scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics (via GTM), Hotjar, OneSignal
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, OneSignal
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional AI-driven e-commerce and web platform targeting SMEs.
  2. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Multiple language options available indicating international targeting.
  4. Use of modern JavaScript frameworks and analytics tools.
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  6. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; only contact forms.
  7. No visible security or incident response policies.
  8. Domain is well-established and not privacy protected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including Vue.js and JavaScript libraries like Slick Carousel. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and OneSignal for push notifications. The hosting infrastructure appears to be AWS-based, inferred from DNS servers. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and supports multiple languages. Performance is moderate with preloading and deferred script loading techniques. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts and lack of DNSSEC. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and supports the business model effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bogavante-loco.dg1.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bogavante-loco.dg1.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.