Skip to main content

Security report for dev-one.org

Dyne.org foundation · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Devuan.org represents the official website for Devuan GNU+Linux, a free and open source operating system forked from Debian that emphasizes systemd-free environments and Init Freedom. The project is supported by the Dyne.org foundation, a non-profit organization acting as fiscal sponsor. The website provides comprehensive information about releases, installation, community, and development resources, targeting Linux users, system administrators, and free software advocates. The business model is community-driven and donation-supported, focusing on niche Linux distribution needs. Technically, the website is a simple, static HTML/CSS site with no client-side scripting or tracking technologies, reflecting a strong commitment to user privacy and minimalism. The site is mobile optimized with good navigation and SEO practices but lacks advanced frameworks or CMS platforms. Performance is moderate, consistent with a lightweight static site. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS (implied by the URL), but no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data. The absence of cookies and JavaScript reduces attack surface and tracking risks. However, the lack of privacy and cookie policies and missing WHOIS registration details reduce overall trust and compliance posture. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional for its niche audience but would benefit from improved transparency in domain registration, privacy compliance, and security best practices to enhance credibility and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dev-one.org

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
50
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Devuan.org operates in the open source technology sector as a small non-profit entity focused on providing a Debian fork without systemd. Its competitive advantage lies in catering to users seeking Init Freedom and systemd alternatives. Revenue streams are primarily donations and community contributions. The target market includes Linux enthusiasts, sysadmins, and organizations valuing software freedom. The partnership with Dyne.org foundation provides fiscal sponsorship and legitimacy. Growth indicators include ongoing releases and active community engagement. The project maintains a lean operational model with a focus on transparency and minimalism.

Security posture

The security maturity level of devuan.org is moderate. The site benefits from minimal attack surface due to lack of cookies, JavaScript, and tracking technologies. HTTPS usage is assumed but not explicitly confirmed in the data. The absence of security headers and vulnerability disclosure policies indicates room for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or known vulnerabilities were detected. Incident response readiness is unclear due to missing contact channels for security issues. Compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations is weak given the lack of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a static informational site but should be enhanced for better trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Verify and publish WHOIS domain registration details or use a registrar that provides transparent WHOIS data.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and provide dedicated security contact information.
  5. Consider adding HTTPS enforcement and regularly audit the site for security best practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dyne.org foundation
Description
Devuan GNU+Linux is a free software operating system, a fork of Debian without systemd, providing users with Init Freedom and a safe upgrade path from Debian.
Key services
Operating system distribution, Software packages, Community support, Development resources
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • No cookies or javascript used on site

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
excellent

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found despite site claiming no cookies or javascript.
  3. Contact information limited to a single public email address.
  4. No phone numbers or physical addresses provided.
  5. No forms present on the site to collect user data.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating strong privacy respect.
  7. Site uses minimal technologies, focusing on static content delivery.
  8. WHOIS data is unavailable or malformed, limiting domain registration insights.
  9. Site content is technical, focused on free software and Linux distribution.
  10. No advertising or marketing tools detected, consistent with non-profit open source ethos.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using basic HTML5 and CSS3 technologies without client-side scripting or CMS frameworks, resulting in a lightweight and privacy-respecting platform. The site is mobile optimized and has good SEO metadata including Open Graph and Twitter Card tags. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not disclosed. Performance is moderate, suitable for the static content delivered. The lack of analytics and tracking tools aligns with the privacy-first approach but limits insights into user behavior. Technical debt appears low due to simplicity, but modernization opportunities include adding security headers and structured data for enhanced SEO and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dev-one.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dev-one.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.