Skip to main content

Security report for detskijmir.lv

Children's summer camps 2025 · Education · Latvia

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Children's summer camps 2025 operates a multilingual WordPress-based website providing information and promotion for various children's summer camps primarily in Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, England, and other countries. The site targets parents and children seeking educational and recreational summer camp opportunities, offering detailed listings and descriptions of camps such as survival, sports, horse riding, and language camps. The business appears to be a small regional niche player with a focus on Baltic countries and surrounding regions. Technically, the site uses a standard WordPress stack with common plugins and Google advertising and analytics integrations. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and content quality. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks visible advanced security headers or explicit security policies. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy assessment. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy for its niche, with moderate risk due to third-party scripts and limited security policy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching detskijmir.lv

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
40
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website serves as an information and promotional platform for children's summer camps, likely monetizing through referrals or advertising. It holds a niche market position focused on Baltic and nearby countries, targeting families interested in educational and recreational camps. The business model is content-driven with a focus on camp listings and event announcements. The presence of social media links and privacy compliance indicates a moderate level of digital maturity. The site has been active since at least 2013, indicating some longevity. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The content quality and branding are consistent, supporting a credible online presence.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting compliance with GDPR and basic security best practices. However, no explicit security policies or incident response contacts are found. The site uses multiple third-party scripts including Google Ads and analytics, which increases the attack surface. Security headers are not explicitly detected in the HTML content, suggesting potential improvements. No direct vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data are observed. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from enhanced header policies, regular plugin updates, and clearer security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Regularly update WordPress core and all plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  3. Minimize and audit third-party scripts to reduce potential attack vectors and improve performance.
  4. Add a visible security policy page and incident response contact information to enhance trust and compliance.
  5. Conduct periodic security audits and penetration testing to identify and remediate hidden vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Children's summer camps 2025
Description
Children's summer camps at the sea in Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, as well as in other countries 2025
Key services
Listing and promotion of summer camps in Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, England, and abroad, Information about specific camps such as survival, sports, horse riding, language camps
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Font Awesome 6, Google Fonts, Google AdSense, Contact Form 7 plugin, Owl Carousel
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of consent mechanism for cookies

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense
Tracking pixels
Google Ads, Google Analytics (implied by Google Tag Manager)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a multilingual WordPress site focused on children's summer camps in Latvia and neighboring countries.
  2. Content is primarily in Latvian and Russian; English version shows message that content is only available in Latvian and Russian.
  3. Contact information is clearly displayed including email and phone number.
  4. Social media presence includes Facebook and YouTube links.
  5. Privacy and cookie consent mechanisms are implemented and visible.
  6. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  7. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  8. Use of multiple third-party scripts including Google Ads and analytics.
  9. No signs of malicious or adult content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern but standard technology stack including PHP, jQuery, Font Awesome, Google Fonts, and several plugins such as Contact Form 7 and Owl Carousel. Google AdSense and Tag Manager are used for advertising and analytics. The site is mobile-optimized and uses responsive design. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements by optimizing third-party scripts and caching. Accessibility is basic but present. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Hosting provider details are not identified from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is adequate for a small business website but could be enhanced for better security and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with detskijmir.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review detskijmir.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.