Skip to main content

Security report for depinpulse.app

Parameter Research · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DePIN Pulse is a specialized analytics platform focused on Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Networks (DePIN). It aggregates and presents data such as revenue, market capitalization, and ecosystem metrics for DePIN projects, targeting blockchain enthusiasts, investors, and project stakeholders. The platform is operated by Parameter Research and leverages multiple reputable blockchain data providers to deliver comprehensive insights. Technically, the website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, providing a responsive and user-friendly experience. The site is well-structured with good SEO and mobile optimization, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, but lacks explicit security policies and incident response information. Privacy compliance is partial with privacy and terms policies present but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the platform presents a professional and trustworthy presence in the niche DePIN analytics market.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching depinpulse.app

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

DePIN Pulse occupies a niche market segment providing analytics for DePIN projects, a growing sector within blockchain infrastructure. Its competitive advantage lies in aggregating diverse data sources from established crypto data providers, offering unique insights and leaderboards. The business model centers on data aggregation and analytics services, likely monetized through platform usage or partnerships. The target customers include investors, project developers, and analysts interested in DePIN. The partnership ecosystem is strong with integrations from multiple reputable data providers, enhancing data reliability and market positioning. Growth indicators include a broad project database and active data updates. The company operates under Parameter Research, a small-sized entity with a focused technology sector presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to strong security posture with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries detected. However, it lacks visible security headers and formal security policies, which are important for compliance and trust. There is no public incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which could hinder rapid response to security issues. GDPR compliance is partial, missing cookie consent mechanisms. The absence of direct contact information for security incidents reduces transparency. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a data analytics platform but could be improved by formalizing policies and enhancing compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie policy and consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance and user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page including contact channels for reporting security issues.
  4. Include clear contact information on the website to improve business credibility and facilitate communication.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerable libraries are introduced.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Parameter Research
Description
DePIN Pulse provides analytics and data dashboards to track Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Network (DePIN) projects, including revenue, market cap, and ecosystem data. It offers leaderboards and insights for DePIN projects.
Key services
DePIN project revenue tracking, Market capitalization data, Ecosystem analytics, Leaderboards and rankings, Mining data, Fundraising information, Research and resources
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, JavaScript, CSS, Web fonts (woff2), SVG images
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Umami
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Umami
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on DePIN analytics and blockchain data.
  3. Privacy policy and terms of service pages are present but cookie policy and consent mechanism are missing.
  4. No direct contact information such as emails or phone numbers found on the site.
  5. Uses modern web technologies and frameworks.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information available.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  8. External links point to reputable blockchain and crypto data providers.
  9. Tracking via Umami analytics is present with minimal user tracking.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React and Next.js stack, leveraging server-side rendering for performance and SEO benefits. It uses web fonts and SVG images for efficient rendering and visual quality. The site loads with moderate speed and is optimized for mobile devices. Accessibility is basic but could be enhanced with ARIA roles and better keyboard navigation support. SEO is well addressed with comprehensive meta tags and Open Graph data. Hosting details are not explicitly available, but the infrastructure appears stable. There is no CMS detected, indicating a custom or static site generation approach. The technical implementation is solid with room for improvements in accessibility and security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with depinpulse.app. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review depinpulse.app.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.