Skip to main content

Security report for dengage.com

Dengage · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

88/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dengage is a technology company specializing in data-centric marketing automation solutions. Founded in 2018, it offers a comprehensive SaaS platform that enables businesses to create dynamic, omni-channel marketing campaigns driven by customer data insights. The company serves a global clientele, trusted by over 200 brands across more than 30 countries, positioning itself as a competitive player in the marketing automation and customer data platform market. Key services include AI-driven marketing optimization, customer data platform capabilities, and multi-channel campaign management.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of dengage.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dengage.com

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
90
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
88

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Dengage operates primarily in the technology and e-commerce sectors, targeting marketing professionals and enterprises seeking to optimize customer engagement through data-driven automation. Its business model revolves around SaaS offerings with cloud and on-premise deployment options. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem, evidenced by partner login portals and helpdesk services. The presence of a careers subdomain indicates ongoing growth and recruitment efforts. Branding is consistent and professional, with a clear focus on innovation and customer experience enhancement.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and employs a robust cookie consent mechanism with detailed user controls, reflecting good privacy compliance. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not evident, representing areas for improvement. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could impact trust from a security perspective. The use of reputable third-party analytics and marketing tools is balanced with privacy considerations. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from enhanced DNS security and formalized incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to strengthen domain name system security and prevent DNS spoofing.
  2. Implement and verify security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish explicit incident response and abuse contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Consider creating a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dengage
Description
Create dynamic customer engagements driven by valuable data insights. Design omni-channel campaigns on one user-friendly platform, on-cloud or on-site.
Key services
Customer Experience Data Platform, AI Marketing Optimization (Zeki), Customer Data Platform, Marketing Automation, Omni-channel Campaign Management
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Swiper.js, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Zoho Forms, CookieYes Consent Management
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of reputable third-party scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, G2 Crowd Attribution
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads, Google Ads, DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
Zoho Forms, Factors.ai
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented with detailed categories and user controls.
  3. Strong branding and consistent professional design.
  4. Use of multiple marketing and analytics tools integrated.
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML; contact primarily via forms and social media.
  6. No explicit security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page found.
  7. DNSSEC not enabled, which is a minor security gap.
  8. No explicit incident response or abuse contact information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS and utilizes modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Swiper.js for UI interactions. It integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and Zoho Forms. Hosting is managed via Google Cloud DNS, providing reliable infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO practices are well implemented with comprehensive meta tags and structured data. The technical stack supports a professional and scalable marketing automation platform, though some security enhancements are recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 85/100Low20 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dengage.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dengage.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.