Skip to main content

Security report for dencrypt.dk

Dencrypt A/S · Technology · Denmark

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dencrypt A/S is a Denmark-based technology company specializing in secure communication solutions that combine advanced encryption with user-friendly applications. Their flagship offerings include the Dencrypt Communication Solution, comprising the Dencrypt Connex app and Dencrypt Server System, both certified by Common Criteria and approved by NATO for classified communications. The company targets organizations and individuals requiring high-security communication channels, positioning itself as a niche leader in secure communication technology. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear business and contact information. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern libraries and includes Google Analytics and reCAPTCHA for security and analytics. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and encrypted communication emphasized, though some security headers and cookie consent mechanisms are missing. WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly impacts trust but is mitigated by the company's certifications and professional presence. Overall, Dencrypt demonstrates a mature digital presence with a focus on security and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dencrypt.dk

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
28
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Dencrypt operates in the secure communication technology sector, offering encrypted voice, video, and messaging solutions primarily to government and enterprise clients. Their business model is B2B and B2G, leveraging certifications and NATO approval as competitive advantages. The company maintains a professional management team with visible LinkedIn profiles, indicating transparency and credibility. Revenue streams likely include software licensing, cloud services, and custom secure communication solutions. The website content and news updates suggest active participation in industry events, supporting growth and market presence. Partnerships and sales channels are managed via direct contact and sales partners. The absence of WHOIS data is a minor concern but does not detract significantly from the company's established market position.

Security posture

Dencrypt exhibits a strong security posture with end-to-end encryption, Dynamic Encryption technology, and certifications such as Common Criteria and NATO approval. The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from abuse. However, the absence of key security headers like Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security score. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a public vulnerability disclosure or security.txt page limits transparency in incident response readiness. GDPR compliance is partially addressed with a privacy policy but lacks a cookie consent mechanism. Overall, Dencrypt demonstrates a mature security culture aligned with its product offerings but could improve web security practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance web security.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner to comply fully with GDPR and improve privacy compliance.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users and meet compliance standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Dencrypt A/S
VAT number
DK-25698908
Registration number
305475877
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dencrypt A/S
Description
Dencrypt specializes in secure communication solutions combining advanced encryption technology with ease of use, offering encrypted voice, video, and messaging services for smartphones and computers.
Key services
Dencrypt Communication Solution, Dencrypt Connex app, Dencrypt Server System, Custom services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA, Contact Form 7, GoodLayers Core plugin, Font Awesome
Platforms
iOS, Android, Windows, MacOS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on secure communication technology with strong emphasis on certifications.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with multiple channels.
  4. WHOIS data is unavailable, which is a minor trust concern.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools is evident.
  6. No cookie consent mechanism detected, which may affect GDPR compliance.
  7. No explicit security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using a modern tech stack including jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and reCAPTCHA for security and analytics. The site loads with moderate performance and is mobile optimized with good navigation clarity. The use of GoodLayers Core plugin and Font Awesome icons contributes to a professional design. However, there is no explicit hosting provider information available. The site lacks some advanced accessibility features and security headers, which are areas for technical improvement. Overall, the infrastructure supports the business needs effectively but could benefit from modernization in security and accessibility practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dencrypt.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dencrypt.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.