Skip to main content

Security report for demartino.ar

Leonardo Demartino · Technology · Argentina

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Leonardo Demartino's website serves as a professional portfolio highlighting his expertise as a lead developer in software, game development, and multimedia applications. The site showcases a variety of projects across multiple platforms including iOS, Android, Steam, and consoles, positioning him as a niche player in the indie game and multimedia software market. The business model is primarily personal branding and project promotion, targeting developers, gamers, and potential collaborators. Technically, the website employs a modern and responsive design using Bootstrap, jQuery, and Google Fonts, ensuring good mobile optimization and user experience. The site is well-structured with clear navigation and professional content presentation. However, no CMS or hosting provider details are evident, and performance is moderate. From a security perspective, the site lacks visible security headers and privacy or cookie policies, which are important for compliance and user trust. No forms or analytics scripts reduce the attack surface and tracking footprint, but the absence of incident response or vulnerability disclosure information indicates room for improvement in security maturity. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices to improve its risk posture and user confidence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching demartino.ar

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website reflects a small technology-focused business centered on individual expertise and indie game development. The market positioning is niche with a strong emphasis on multimedia and blockchain technologies. Key competitive advantages include a diverse technical skill set and a portfolio of published applications across major platforms. The business model relies on showcasing projects and collaborations, with potential revenue streams from game sales and software licensing. Target customers include gamers, developers, and multimedia enthusiasts. Growth indicators include ongoing projects and recent co-founding of a software lab. The partnership ecosystem includes LemonChili Games and DefleMask Tracker, indicating a collaborative approach. Strategic observations suggest focusing on expanding visibility and formalizing compliance and security frameworks.

Security posture

The current security posture is basic with no detected HTTPS enforcement or security headers in the provided data, which are critical for protecting user data and preventing common web attacks. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and similar regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are published, limiting transparency and readiness for security events. However, the lack of forms and tracking scripts reduces exposure to data leakage and privacy risks. To improve, the site should implement HTTPS, add security headers, publish privacy and cookie policies, and establish a vulnerability disclosure process. These steps will enhance trust and reduce potential business impact from security incidents.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with strict transport security headers to secure data in transit.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and build user trust.
  3. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and incident response.
  5. Incorporate basic analytics with privacy-respecting configurations to monitor site usage and improve user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Leonardo Demartino
Description
Personal website of Leonardo Demartino, a lead developer specializing in software development, multimedia, game design, and blockchain technologies. Showcases projects, work experience, and publications.
Key services
Game development, Software development, Multimedia applications, Chiptune music software
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, Bootstrap, jQuery, Fork Awesome icons, Google Fonts
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • No forms detected, reducing attack surface
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, which may impact compliance.
  2. No forms present, reducing data collection and attack surface.
  3. Strong personal branding with detailed project portfolio and social media links.
  4. No security headers detected in provided data; recommend adding for improved security.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
  6. Website is mobile responsive and well structured.
  7. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
  8. No contact phone numbers or physical addresses beyond city and country found.
  9. No security or incident response policies published.
  10. No certifications or compliance badges displayed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a clean and modern tech stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for scripting, and Fork Awesome for icons. Google Fonts enhance typography. The site is static HTML without CMS, reducing complexity and attack surface. Performance is moderate, likely due to external font and icon dependencies. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive layouts and viewport meta tags. SEO is supported by proper meta description and title tags. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with ARIA roles and better semantic markup. No hosting or server details are available, limiting infrastructure assessment. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a personal portfolio site but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with demartino.ar. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review demartino.ar.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.