Skip to main content

Security report for deltascheme.com

Transparity · Technology · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Transparity is a UK-based technology company specializing in Microsoft Modern Workplace Solutions, offering a broad range of IT consultancy and managed services tailored for organizations aiming to digitally transform their workplaces. The company positions itself as a specialist Microsoft solutions provider with a comprehensive service portfolio including app innovation, AI services, Azure cloud, cyber security, and licensing. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and strong branding consistency. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with integrations of modern analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Demandbase, and Cookiebot for consent management. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. However, the lack of publicly available WHOIS data introduces a slight transparency concern, although the overall trustworthiness remains high based on website content and business information. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a security policy, and maintaining regular audits of third-party scripts to sustain security and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching deltascheme.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Transparity operates in the competitive IT consultancy sector with a focus on Microsoft technologies, targeting medium to large organizations seeking modern workplace transformation. Their business model is B2B, providing tailored solutions and managed services that likely generate revenue through licensing, consulting fees, and managed service contracts. The company leverages partnerships with Microsoft and possibly other technology providers, as indicated by their service offerings and marketing integrations. The presence of a dedicated careers subdomain suggests organizational growth and investment in talent acquisition. The company maintains a professional online presence with comprehensive service descriptions and trust signals such as structured data and contact transparency, positioning itself as a credible player in the UK technology market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts is managed with consent, though the site could benefit from implementing additional security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options to mitigate risks such as clickjacking and cross-site scripting. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. Overall, the security posture is strong for a commercial website but could be enhanced with formalized policies and technical header improvements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Ensure all web forms include anti-CSRF tokens and robust input validation.
  5. Maintain transparency in domain registration or consider disclosing privacy protection rationale.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Transparity
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Transparity
Description
At Transparity, we specialise in delivering comprehensive Microsoft Modern Workplace Solutions tailored to empower organisations in the digital era.
Key services
Microsoft Modern Workplace Solutions, App Innovation, AI Services, Azure Cloud, Business Applications, Cyber Security, Data Consultancy Services, Managed Services, Microsoft Funding, Microsoft Licensing
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Gravity Forms, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft technologies (implied), Cloudflare (DNS and CDN), Cookiebot (consent management), Demandbase (B2B marketing), Bing Ads, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Microsoft Clarity
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security and analytics scripts with integrity attributes

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Demandbase
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense, Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag, Microsoft Clarity, Demandbase
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, Demandbase, Factors.ai
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms in place
  3. Use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools
  4. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, reducing transparency
  6. No explicit terms of service or security policy found
  7. Contact information is clear and includes phone and physical address
  8. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress CMS, utilizing Gravity Forms for form management and integrating multiple analytics and marketing technologies such as Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Demandbase, and Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie management. The site loads scripts asynchronously to optimize performance and employs modern web standards for mobile responsiveness and accessibility. Hosting details are not explicitly identified, but DNS and CDN services appear to be managed via Cloudflare. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. The technical stack is modern and appropriate for the business scale, though continuous monitoring and updates are recommended to avoid technical debt and security risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with deltascheme.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review deltascheme.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.