Skip to main content

Security report for delltechnologies.com

Dell Technologies · Technology · Finland

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dell Technologies is a global leader in technology solutions, offering a wide range of products and services including technical support, partner programs, and enterprise solutions. The Finnish localized site targets corporate customers with comprehensive resources and account management features. The technical infrastructure is robust, leveraging modern JavaScript frameworks, advanced analytics, and marketing tools, ensuring a fast, accessible, and mobile-optimized user experience. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security policies and incident response details are not publicly disclosed. Overall, the site reflects a mature digital presence consistent with a large enterprise technology company.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching delltechnologies.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention delltechnologies.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
15
Employees
0
Customers
7
Third parties
8
Weak passwords
7%

4 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for delltechnologies.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Dell Technologies maintains a strong market position as a technology provider with a diversified portfolio including hardware, software, and services. The website supports multiple customer segments including corporate clients and partners. The business model focuses on direct sales, partner ecosystems, and service delivery. The presence of extensive marketing and analytics tools indicates a data-driven approach to customer engagement and retention. The company’s global brand recognition and consistent digital branding reinforce its credibility and trustworthiness in the market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a high level of security maturity with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of publicly available security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure programs suggests areas for improvement in transparency and security communication. The extensive use of third-party scripts necessitates ongoing monitoring to mitigate supply chain risks.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to enhance transparency.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Provide contact information for the Data Protection Officer to comply with GDPR best practices.
  4. Regularly audit and minimize third-party scripts to reduce potential attack surface.
  5. Enhance user trust by displaying relevant certifications and compliance badges.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dell Technologies
Description
Tutustu teknologiaratkaisuihimme, palveluihimme ja tukeemme osoitteessa Dell.com. Etsi Premier-kirjautumissivu, etsi Dell-kumppani tai varaa puhelu myyntitiimimme kanssa jo tänään.
Key services
technology solutions, technical services, technical support, partner search, Premier login, sales call booking
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Adobe Target, Brightcove Video Player, Coveo Search, Securiti.ai Consent Management, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Bing Ads, Facebook Pixel, Twitter Analytics, LinkedIn Pixel, TikTok Pixel, Salesforce Live Agent, Boostrapping scripts
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content Security Policy implemented
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Adobe Target, Bing Ads, Twitter Analytics, LinkedIn Pixel, Quantserve, Yahoo Analytics, TikTok Pixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Smaato, Smart AdServer, Rubicon Project, Flashtalking, 3lift, ContextWeb, Axonix, AdmanMedia, Sharethrough, Lemonpi, Advangelists, Outbrain, Cootlogix, Evergage, Quantserve, Reddit Ads, Eyeota, Tapad, Iper2, Bazaarvoice
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Twitter Analytics, LinkedIn Pixel, TikTok Pixel, Quantserve, Bing Ads, Yahoo Analytics
Marketing tools
Adobe Target, Evergage, Salesforce Live Agent, Coveo Search
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy in Finnish language.
  3. Strong use of third-party marketing and analytics tools.
  4. No exposed sensitive data or security vulnerabilities detected in HTML.
  5. WHOIS data is unavailable publicly, likely due to privacy or registry restrictions.
  6. Website is professionally designed, mobile optimized, and accessible.
  7. No adult or questionable content detected; suitable for general audience.
  8. Contact options include login, account management, and contact us page.
  9. No explicit security policy or incident response information found on main page.
Technical notes

Notes

The site uses a modern tech stack including JavaScript frameworks, Adobe Target for personalization, Brightcove for video content, and Coveo for search functionality. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing pixels from major platforms such as Google, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, and TikTok. The CMS appears to be a proprietary Dell system with content studio integration. Performance is optimized with preconnect and preload hints, and the site is fully responsive with good accessibility features. Hosting details are not explicitly disclosed but the infrastructure appears enterprise-grade.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 75/100Medium10 findings · partial scanView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with delltechnologies.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review delltechnologies.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.