Skip to main content

Security report for dekod.hr

DEKOD d.o.o. · Technology · Croatia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DEKOD d.o.o. is a well-established Croatian ticketing organization with over two decades of experience and a leading market position in the region. The company offers a comprehensive suite of ticketing and event management services, including e-ticketing systems, payment solutions, and web shop capabilities. Their clientele includes cultural institutions, event organizers, and public venues, supported by a strong regional presence and trusted partnerships such as with ulaznice.hr. The website reflects a professional business focus with clear contact information and client testimonials, reinforcing their credibility. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with the Enfold theme and uses common web technologies, but it runs outdated software versions that pose security risks. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacks modern security headers and visible privacy or cookie policies, indicating room for compliance improvement. Overall, the website is functional and trustworthy but would benefit from technical and compliance updates to enhance security and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dekod.hr

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
30
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

DEKOD operates in the technology sector specializing in ticketing solutions, serving a diverse client base across Croatia and the surrounding region. Their business model centers on providing integrated ticket sales platforms, including online and local sales channels, e-learning systems, and payment processing. The company leverages partnerships with platforms like ulaznice.hr to extend market reach. Their long domain age and consistent WHOIS data support a stable market presence. Testimonials from reputable clients such as cultural festivals and concert halls highlight their competitive advantage in service quality and technical support. The company targets event organizers and cultural institutions, positioning itself as a key enabler of ticketing infrastructure in the region. Growth indicators include recent projects involving e-learning and cloud technologies, suggesting ongoing innovation and expansion.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and Cloudflare DNS services, providing a baseline of transport security and DNS reliability. However, the use of outdated WordPress (4.9.28) and jQuery (1.12.4) versions exposes the site to known vulnerabilities, increasing risk. The absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks like clickjacking and MIME sniffing. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency and preparedness. Privacy and cookie policies are missing, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires urgent updates and policy implementations to mitigate risks and improve compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Upgrade WordPress and all JavaScript libraries to the latest stable versions to address security vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements and user consent mechanisms.
  3. Add essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance web security.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response contact channel and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities proactively.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
DEKOD d.o.o.
Registration number
00857831
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
DEKOD d.o.o.
Description
Dekod is a leading Croatian ticketing organization with over twenty years of history and the most extensive and diverse user base in the region.
Key services
Ticketing organization, E-ticketing system implementation, Payment systems, Web shop services, E-learning platforms, Event management solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 4.9.28, Enfold theme 4.2.3, jQuery 1.12.4, MediaElement.js, Google Fonts, Google Maps API
Frameworks
WordPress, Avia Framework
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS and name servers

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage or footer.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with email, phone, and physical address.
  4. Social media presence includes Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn with official company pages.
  5. Website uses an outdated WordPress version which may pose security risks.
  6. No visible security headers or incident response contacts found.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
  8. Website content is professional and business-focused on ticketing and event management.
  9. No advertising or tracking scripts detected beyond standard WordPress and theme scripts.
  10. Good branding consistency and trust indicators from testimonials and client references.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 4.9.28 using the Enfold theme and Avia Framework, with jQuery 1.12.4 and MediaElement.js for media playback. Google Fonts and Google Maps API are integrated for enhanced UI and location services. Hosting is supported by Cloudflare DNS and name servers, providing reliable DNS resolution and potential CDN benefits. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity and professional design. However, the outdated CMS and libraries indicate technical debt and potential security risks. Performance is moderate, with no advanced caching or optimization scripts detected. SEO is basic with standard meta tags but lacks advanced schema or Open Graph metadata. Accessibility features are minimal. Modernization opportunities include CMS upgrade, improved SEO metadata, enhanced accessibility, and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dekod.hr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dekod.hr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.