Skip to main content

Security report for deciso.com

Deciso · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Deciso is a technology company specializing in network security solutions, primarily through its hardware and software firewall products, including the OPNsense platform. Positioned as a trusted partner for businesses seeking robust digital protection, Deciso emphasizes certified and community-driven security innovations. The website reflects a professional business model focused on product sales and customer engagement within the technology sector. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with common plugins and scripts, but suffers from a lack of HTTPS due to an invalid or missing SSL certificate, which significantly impacts security posture. The site includes Google Analytics and Tag Manager for user tracking but lacks privacy and cookie policies, indicating poor privacy compliance. Security headers are minimal, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are present, suggesting room for improvement in security governance. Overall, the website is content-rich and well-structured but requires urgent security enhancements to protect user data and improve trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching deciso.com

This scan found 20 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
90
GDPR outside view
25
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Deciso operates in the competitive network security market, leveraging its OPNsense firewall platform as a key differentiator. The company targets businesses requiring reliable and certified firewall solutions, offering both hardware and software products. Its business model centers on product development, community collaboration, and customer support. The website's content and navigation indicate a medium-sized enterprise with consistent branding and a clear focus on technology innovation. However, the absence of privacy and security policies may affect customer confidence and regulatory compliance. The use of popular CMS and tracking tools suggests a standard digital marketing approach but also highlights potential privacy risks. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the domain data or website content.

Security posture

The security posture of the Deciso website is currently weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate, resulting in no HTTPS support. This is a critical vulnerability that exposes users to potential data interception and undermines trust. Security headers are limited to a basic Content-Security-Policy directive restricting frame ancestors, with no HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, or other common headers implemented. The site does not employ modern TLS protocols or session resumption features, and OCSP stapling is disabled. There is no evidence of published security policies, incident response plans, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. While no active vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or POODLE were detected, the lack of fundamental security controls significantly lowers the overall security score and increases risk exposure.

Recommendations

  1. Install and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Implement comprehensive security headers including HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  4. Develop and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to enhance transparency and incident response readiness.
  5. Review and update technical infrastructure to support modern TLS protocols and enable OCSP stapling and session resumption for improved security and performance.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on an Apache 2.4.52 server running on Ubuntu, using WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO and Contact Form 7 plugins. The front-end uses jQuery and GSAP for animations and interactions. DNS is managed via SectigoWeb nameservers, with SPF and DMARC records configured correctly for email protection. However, the SSL certificate is invalid or missing, and no TLS protocols are enabled, which is a significant technical deficiency. Performance metrics are not available, but the site includes multiple external scripts and tracking services that may impact load times. Mobile optimization appears good based on responsive CSS and meta viewport tags. SEO is supported by Yoast plugin and proper meta tags including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA roles and semantic HTML but no advanced features detected.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with deciso.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review deciso.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.