Skip to main content

Security report for debridge.foundation

deBridge Foundation · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

deBridge Foundation operates a specialized Reserve Fund platform that accumulates and tracks DBR tokens and other strategic assets using 100% of protocol earnings. The website provides real-time data visualization and proof of reserves to enhance transparency for the deBridge ecosystem participants. The platform targets cryptocurrency investors and DeFi users interested in the financial health and reserve status of the deBridge protocol. Technically, the site is built on Angular with modern libraries such as Chart.js and integrates Google Tag Manager and Intercom for analytics and user engagement. The use of Cloudflare DNS and HTTPS ensures a secure and reliable hosting environment. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and domain transfer protections, but could be improved by enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, and publishing a formal security policy. Privacy compliance is partially met with a comprehensive privacy policy but lacks a cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and technically mature, supporting the foundation's credibility in the blockchain space.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching debridge.foundation

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention debridge.foundation, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for debridge.foundation right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The deBridge Foundation positions itself as a transparent and accountable entity managing a reserve fund for the DBR token ecosystem. Its business model revolves around accumulating protocol earnings to enhance token value and ecosystem stability. The website's integration with blockchain explorers and market data sources like Solscan and Coingecko supports investor confidence. The foundation maintains active social media channels for community engagement. While the domain is newly registered in 2024, this aligns with the foundation's recent establishment. The lack of direct contact information suggests a focus on decentralized governance or community channels rather than traditional corporate communication. The foundation's strategic use of technology and transparent reporting tools positions it well within the competitive DeFi and blockchain reserve management niche.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good baseline security posture with enforced HTTPS, clientTransferProhibited domain status, and professional DNS management via Cloudflare. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options represents areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency in handling security incidents. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism despite tracking scripts. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, suitable for the current business scale but requiring enhancements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to mitigate common web attacks.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and improve user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
deBridge Foundation
Description
The deBridge Reserve Fund uses 100% of deBridge protocol earnings to accumulate DBR and other strategically important assets to enhance and preserve value for the deBridge ecosystem. It tracks reserve holdings and provides Proof of Reserves for all assets collected by deBridge.
Key services
Tracking reserve holdings, Providing proof of reserves, Displaying token holdings and fund allocations, Offering DBR token acquisition links
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Angular 16.2.12, Google Tag Manager, Intercom, Chart.js, Material Design Components (Angular Material), Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Angular
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS for DNS management

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Intercom
Marketing tools
Intercom
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on blockchain reserve fund tracking with real-time data visualization.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the page.
  4. Privacy and terms of service documents are linked and appear comprehensive.
  5. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite use of tracking scripts.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks indicates good technical maturity.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file found.
  9. Social media presence includes Twitter and Medium links.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Angular 16.2.12, leveraging modern frontend technologies including Material Design Components and Chart.js for data visualization. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Intercom for analytics and user engagement. Hosting appears to be managed via Cloudflare DNS, providing reliable and secure DNS resolution. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility basics. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. The absence of a CMS suggests a custom-built solution tailored for the foundation's specific needs. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers, which should be addressed to reduce attack surface. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-implemented, supporting the foundation's operational goals effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with debridge.foundation. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review debridge.foundation.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.