Skip to main content

Security report for debricked.com

Open Text Corporation · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Debricked.com is the web presence for OpenText Core SCA, a solution focused on open source vulnerability management. The website clearly positions itself as part of OpenText Corporation, a large enterprise software company, providing SaaS offerings for software composition analysis and vulnerability tracking. The site targets developers and security teams seeking to manage open source risks efficiently. Technically, the site is built using the Hugo static site generator, employs modern web standards, and integrates Google Tag Manager and OneTrust for analytics and privacy compliance. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, although explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not found. Overall, the website is professional, well-branded, and trustworthy, reflecting the backing of a major enterprise entity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
63/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching debricked.com

This scan found 12 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
55
Email security
87
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
63
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates within the technology sector, specifically focusing on open source security and vulnerability management. As a subsidiary or product line of OpenText Corporation, it benefits from strong market positioning and enterprise credibility. The business model is SaaS-based, offering tools and databases for vulnerability detection and open source project evaluation. The target audience includes software developers, security professionals, and organizations reliant on open source components. The partnership ecosystem includes OpenText and related domains. The website content and structure indicate a mature digital presence with good compliance and marketing practices.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent managed via OneTrust, indicating GDPR compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security policy pages, incident response contacts, and security.txt files suggests room for improvement in transparency and incident management readiness. Security headers are likely present but not explicitly visible in the HTML. Overall, the site is secure for visitors but could enhance its security communication and disclosure practices.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ emails.
  3. Implement and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
  4. Review and explicitly configure security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options.
  5. Add terms of service to clarify legal usage and responsibilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Open Text Corporation
Description
Open source vulnerability management made simple. OpenText Core SCA helps you stay on top of security while maintaining your development speed.
Key services
Open source vulnerability management, OpenText Core Software Composition Analysis (SCA), Vulnerability database, Open Source Select project evaluation
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Hugo static site generator, Google Tag Manager, OneTrust cookie consent, Unicons icon set, Open Sans font, JavaScript, CSS3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
OneTrust
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Strong integration with OpenText branding and services.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented via OneTrust.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage.
  5. No explicit terms of service or security policy pages detected.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and good SEO practices.
  7. Presence of social media link to YouTube channel.
  8. Privacy policy is linked externally to OpenText's main privacy page.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern static site generator (Hugo), ensuring fast load times and good performance. It uses standard web technologies including CSS3, JavaScript, and web fonts. Analytics and cookie management are handled by Google Tag Manager and OneTrust respectively, reflecting a mature approach to user tracking and privacy compliance. The site is mobile optimized and accessible with good SEO metadata. Hosting details are not explicit but the presence of CDN and Google services suggests reliable infrastructure. Technical risks are minimal, with no visible outdated or vulnerable components.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with debricked.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review debricked.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.