Skip to main content

Security report for dd86k.space

Technology · Iceland

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website dd86k.space is a personal portfolio and resource hub primarily focused on showcasing the author's projects, manuals, documentation, and public resources. It serves a general audience interested in technology and software development. The site includes links to related blogs, error databases, and multiple code hosting profiles, indicating an active engagement in software projects and open source contributions. The business model is personal and informational rather than commercial, with no evident monetization or e-commerce features. Technically, the website is built with basic HTML and CSS, without advanced frameworks or CMS platforms. Hosting appears to be through Namecheap, with DNS servers managed by the registrar. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile use but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. No analytics or advertising technologies are detected, indicating minimal user tracking and a privacy-conscious approach. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS (implied by domain registrar and modern standards, though SSL configuration details are not provided). However, no security headers are detected, and DNSSEC is not enabled, which are areas for improvement. The domain is privacy protected via a service based in Iceland, which is appropriate for a personal site. No privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service are present, which limits compliance with GDPR and other regulations. No contact information or incident response details are provided, reducing transparency. Overall, the website is safe, professional, and suitable for general audiences but lacks formal privacy and security documentation. The AI score reflects good content and business credibility but penalizes the site for missing compliance and security best practices. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy policies, and contact transparency would enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dd86k.space

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site operates as a personal technology portfolio for the individual or entity known as 'dd86k'. It targets developers, technical users, and followers of the author's projects. The business model is informational and community-oriented, focusing on sharing knowledge, documentation, and project updates. The presence of multiple code hosting profiles and a blog suggests active development and community engagement. There is no indication of revenue generation or commercial partnerships. The domain age (since 2018) supports a stable presence. The use of privacy protection aligns with personal privacy preferences rather than corporate transparency. The ecosystem includes related subdomains for blog and error database, enhancing content depth. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident.

Security posture

The security posture is basic. The site uses HTTPS but lacks DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security. No forms or input fields are present, reducing attack surface. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and similar regulations. The domain privacy protection is appropriate for a personal site but limits registrant transparency. Overall, the site has low risk but would benefit from implementing security best practices and compliance documentation to improve trust and resilience.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance domain name system security.
  2. Implement standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to protect against common web attacks.
  3. Add a clear privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Provide contact information and incident response details to increase transparency and support.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Personal website showcasing the author's projects, manuals, documentation, and public resources.
Key services
About me & projects, User manuals, Documentation archive and API reference, Public files and releases, Blog with project updates, Error message database
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a personal portfolio and resource hub for the author 'dd86k'.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers provided on the site.
  4. No security policies or incident response information available.
  5. No analytics or advertising scripts detected.
  6. Site uses basic HTML and CSS with no advanced frameworks or CMS.
  7. WHOIS data shows privacy protection and domain registered with Namecheap.
  8. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a minor security gap.
  9. External links point to related project and code hosting platforms.
  10. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with simple HTML5 and CSS3 without any detected JavaScript frameworks or CMS platforms. Hosting is managed via Namecheap with registrar DNS servers. The site structure is clear and navigable with well-organized links to internal and external resources. Performance is moderate with no advanced optimization detected. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic but functional. SEO is minimal with basic meta tags but no Open Graph or structured data. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, indicating minimal data collection. The technical setup is low complexity but stable for a personal portfolio site.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dd86k.space. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dd86k.space.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.