Skip to main content

Security report for dd.xyz

Webacy Inc · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Webacy Inc operates a web3 security and compliance platform focused on providing safer experiences for blockchain users and investors. The platform offers services such as risk exposure analysis, wallet monitoring, leaderboards, quests, and MiCA compliance reports for tokens. Positioned as a niche player in the web3 security space, Webacy partners with recognized entities like Mintify, ENS, and Quantstamp to enhance trust and service quality. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks including Next.js and React, hosted likely on Vercel, and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Hotjar, and Twitter Ads. The site is performant, mobile-optimized, and uses secure HTTPS connections with Stripe for payment processing. Security posture is generally strong with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies and no visible GDPR compliance indicators. The WHOIS data is missing, which raises concerns about domain transparency and trustworthiness despite the professional presentation and partnerships. Overall, the site is credible but would benefit from improved privacy disclosures and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Twitter

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dd.xyz

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Webacy targets web3 users, crypto investors, and token analysts with a subscription-based business model focused on security and compliance services. Its competitive advantage lies in detailed token risk analysis and MiCA compliance reporting, supported by partnerships with industry leaders. The company appears small but well-positioned in the emerging regulatory landscape for crypto assets. Revenue streams likely include membership fees for monthly and yearly plans, as indicated by Unlock Protocol integration. The partnership ecosystem enhances credibility and market reach. Growth indicators include active content updates and integration of new regulatory compliance features. Strategic observations suggest a focus on expanding compliance reporting and user engagement through quests and leaderboards.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, secure payment integration, and use of reputable analytics and marketing tools. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security or incident response policies indicate room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The missing WHOIS data and lack of contact information for security incidents reduce transparency and incident response readiness. Compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations is not clearly demonstrated, which could pose regulatory risks. Overall, the security culture appears professional but incomplete in documentation and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information to improve security transparency and readiness.
  4. Provide clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers to enhance trust and user support.
  5. Consider registering WHOIS data publicly or providing justification for privacy protection to improve domain trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Webacy Inc
Description
Webacy provides a safer web3 experience for everyone, offering tools such as risk exposure analysis, wallet watch, leaderboards, quests, and MiCA compliance reports for tokens.
Key services
Risk Exposure Analysis, Wallet Watch, Leaderboard, Quests, MiCA Compliance Reports, Token Discovery Lists
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Stripe, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Unlock Protocol, Dynamic.xyz, Cloudflare Insights, Twitter Universal Website Tag, HypeLab Analytics
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure payment integration (Stripe)
  • Use of security and analytics scripts with async loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Cloudflare Insights, HypeLab Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Twitter Ads
Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Twitter Universal Website Tag, Cloudflare Insights
Marketing tools
HypeLab Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in the HTML content.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage.
  4. Strong use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  5. Partnership logos indicate industry recognition and trust.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. No signs of adult or inappropriate content.
  8. WHOIS data missing, which is a concern for domain transparency.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, with hosting likely on Vercel. It integrates multiple third-party services such as Stripe for payments, Hotjar and Google Analytics for user behavior tracking, and Unlock Protocol for membership management. The site loads efficiently with asynchronous script loading and is mobile-optimized. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No CMS is detected, indicating a custom or framework-based build. The technical infrastructure is robust but could benefit from enhanced security headers and privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dd.xyz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dd.xyz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.