Skip to main content

Security report for dccs.at

DCCS GmbH · Technology · Austria

Partial score · DNS & email only

55/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DCCS GmbH is a large Austrian IT company specializing in business IT solutions, digital transformation, and AI applications primarily serving industrial and energy sectors. The company operates multiple offices across Austria, Germany, and Bosnia and Herzegovina, employing over 330 professionals. Their website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive service offerings and strong branding. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks such as Liferay and React, with integrated analytics and captcha services. However, a critical security gap exists due to the lack of a valid SSL certificate and proper HTTPS configuration, which undermines user trust and data security. Privacy and cookie compliance are well implemented, with clear policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the website is professional and content-rich but requires urgent remediation of its SSL/TLS configuration to meet security best practices.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dccs.at

This scan found 7 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
70
DNS health
50
Network security
100
Average
55

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

DCCS positions itself as a trusted IT partner for digital business solutions, focusing on consulting, software modernization, AI, and digital services. Their client portfolio includes major industrial and automotive companies, indicating strong market positioning. The business model revolves around tailored IT services and agile team rentals, targeting enterprises undergoing digital transformation. The presence of multiple partner domains suggests a collaborative ecosystem. The company emphasizes user-centered design and operational support, highlighting a full lifecycle service approach. Growth is supported by a broad geographic footprint and a large workforce. The website content and references indicate a stable and credible business with a focus on innovation and customer-centric solutions.

Security posture

The website demonstrates awareness of security best practices through the use of multiple security headers and restrictive content security policies. Cookies are set with Secure and HttpOnly flags, and a permissions policy limits browser features. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols represent a critical vulnerability, exposing users to potential interception and undermining trust. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available, which could be improved to enhance transparency. The site uses FriendlyCaptcha to mitigate bot traffic and Matomo for privacy-conscious analytics. Overall, the security posture is moderate but compromised by the lack of proper HTTPS implementation.

Recommendations

  1. Acquire and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate immediately to enable HTTPS.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or 1.3) and disable insecure ones.
  3. Implement OCSP stapling to improve certificate validation performance.
  4. Publish a security policy and vulnerability disclosure page to enhance transparency.
  5. Consider appointing and publishing Data Protection Officer contact information.
  6. Regularly audit and update security headers and CSP to adapt to evolving threats.
  7. Enhance incident response readiness and communicate contact channels for security issues.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
DCCS GmbH
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Liferay CMS platform with React and Clay UI components, indicating a modern and modular architecture. It integrates Matomo analytics for user tracking and FriendlyCaptcha for bot mitigation. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. Performance data is unavailable, but the use of combined and minified resources suggests optimization efforts. The DNS configuration lacks DNSSEC and CAA records, which could be added to improve DNS security. The absence of a valid SSL certificate is the most significant technical risk, impacting secure communications. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but requires urgent security upgrades.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dccs.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dccs.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.